The Telangana High Court disposed of Writ Appeal No.156 of 2009 as infructuous by the learned counsel for the appellant, closing pending miscellaneous petitions without costs.
Writ appeal disposed as infructuous; pending miscellaneous petitions closed; no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
WEDNESDAY. THE TENTHDAYOF NOVEIVBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTYONE PRESENT
THE HON'BLE THECHIEF JUSTICE SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA AND THE HON'BLESRIJUSTICEA. RAJASHEKER REDDY
WRIT APPEALNO:15 6oF 2009
Writ Appeal underclause15 of the Letters Patent preferred against the order passedin W.P.No.9075/2008,dated 30-09-2008 on the file of the HighCourt'
Between:
KakatiyaUniversitv, Rep bv its Resistrar Vidv'lYiBB'JiSi,'flR83'iootto',.
AND
'R:.:,|:TiXsI:g'"1i8;ll?,X1"?,i3tllfi':?:'?J"'V:['C:';;;EN,RESPoNDENT
o 0
o 0 NO:2oF20 Petitionunder Section151 CPC Prayingthatin the circumstances stated in the h Courtmaybe Pleasedto stay the affidavitfiled in supportof the petition' the Hig W.P.No'9075of 1998' dated '13-09- operationof the order of Hon'ble Single Benchin 2008during the PendencYof the above referredappeal
Counselfor the Appellant:SRI ADI VENKATE SWARRAO
Counselfor RespondentNo' 1: SRI S' A' V' RATNAM Counselfor RespondentNo' 2: SRI P'B' VIJAYAKUMAR
TheCourt delivered the following:JUDGMENT
T HON'BLE
CE TISH SHARMA AND
THE HON'BLE SRI CE A. RAJ ASH EKER REDDY
WRIT APPEAL No.156 of 2009
JUDGMENT: ti,t t tir: tjon,bt,, r/re (-hr(, Justrce scrrsh Cirrrfr(trd .Stharrrq/
Learned counsel for the appellant has fairly stated before this Court that the matter has become infructuous. Accordingly, the writ appeal is disposed of as infructuous. Pending miscellanr:ous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
-.-.----
s D/' c H vE#YlrRESEtiHiH i/TRUE COPY//
ly- - To, SECTION OFFICER 1 2 3 4. I fflldtnltQi'#.{irs, ::;' ", MBCff ffi $il,,;
HIGH COURT
DATED: 1011112021
1 r.l E sIA
oo 3 0 id0vini!
.': /
t:,.r-
JUDGMENT
WA.No.156 of 2009
DISMISSINGTHE WRIT APPEAL AS
NFRUCTUOUS,WITHOUT COSTS
\ZDY
Kakatiya University, Rep by its Registrar
1 Dr. P. Sambaiah
2 Waransi Lal
R.K. Timsa
Satish Chandra Sharma
A. Rajasheker Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
