Writ Appeals were allowed to be withdrawn by appellant counsel upon the ground that the lower authority passed an order, and the appeals were dismissed as withdrawn with pending interlocutory applications dismissed.
Writ appeals allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed as withdrawn; interlocutory applications dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
\
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
TUESDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTIGE SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA AND
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A. RAJASHEKER REDDY
WRIT APPEAL NOS: 66 AND 68 OF 2020
wA NO.66 0F 2020:
Writ Appeal under clause 1 5 of the Letters Patentpreferred Against the Order Dated 3011212019 in W.P.No 29041 Of 2019 on the file of the High Court.
Between:
Sri.T.Kishan Singh, S/o. Sri.T.Prem Singh, Aged40 years, Occ.Business, R/o. 15-1-419, Feel Khana, Begum Bazar, Hyderabad. ...AppELLANr
AND
...RES,ONDENTS
lA NO: 1 OF 2020
Petition under Section 151 CPCprayingthatin the circumstancesstated in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the High court may be pleasedto permit the petitioner to use the premises and undertake developmentactivity in premises bearing H.no.14-3-251t1 and2 situatedat Goshamahal, Begum Bazar,Hyderabad, pending disposal of the writ appeal
Counsel for the Appellant: SRI S.SRIDHAR
Counsel for Respondent Nos.1 to 5: GP FOR REVENUE
Counsel for Respondent No.6: GP FOR HOME
WA NO: 68 OF 2020
writ Appeal under clause15 of the Letters Patent preferred against the orderdated 3011212019 in W.P. No.29043of 2019 on the file of the High Court.
Betwee n:
Sri. T.Gyaneshwar Singh,S/o- Sri.T.Prem Singh, Aged38 years' Occ- Business, R/o- 15-i-419, Feel Khana,Begum Bazar' Hyderabad. ...AppELLANr
AND
_.*.rroNDENrs
lA NO: I OF 2020
Petition under section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to permit the petitioner to use the premises and undertake deveropment activity in premises bearing H.no.14-3-zs1r1 and 2 situated at Goshamahar, Begum Bazar, Hyderabad, pending disposal of the writ appeal
Counsel for the Appellant: SRI S. SRIDHAR
Counsel for Respondent Nos. 1 to 5: Gp FOR REVENUE
Counsel for Respondent No. 6: Gp FOR HOME
The Court delivered the following: COMMON JUDGMENT
T h andf
and
/t
I R e d Writ Apoeal Nos.66 & 6g of 2020
COmmOn JUdgment: (per rhe Hon,ble rhe Chief Justice sarish Chanara srrarma)
Learned counsel for the appellants prays ro withdraw
the \7rit Appeals on the ground that respondent
No.4/Tahsildar has already passed an order in these matters. 2. Praver is allowed.
Consequenth., Inrerlocurorv AppLcations, pcnding if
anv, stand dismissed.
//TRUE COPY//
SD/-CH.VEN KATESWARULU DEPUTY REGISTRAR Itt \.,' ,/
SECTION OFFICER
To,
IMBC \ *--
HIGH COURT r'"
DATED: 0911112021
1 HE STA
(
C
(_l 2 s N0l,l$pt l)
a Or:S -,r,i
COMMON JUDGMENT
WA.Nos.66 & 68 of 2020
DISMISSING THE WRIT APPEALS
WITHOUT COSTS
T. Kishan Singh
T. Gyaneshwar Singh
State of Telangana
District Collector, Hyderabad
Revenue Divisional Officer, Hyderabad
Tahsildar, Nampally Mandal
Satish Chandra Sharma
A. Rajasheker Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
