Dismissed

Mettupally Santhosh Reddy , Mastan Reddy v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC3 Mar 2021TRCRLP/6/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Justice G. Sri Devi addressed a Transfer Criminal Petition seeking transfer of a criminal case. The court noted that the petition filed before was disposed of, and the underlying criminal case was quashed where the accused were acquitted. Consequently, the transfer petition was dismissed as infructuous.

What did the court decide?

The Transfer Criminal Petition is dismissed as infructuous.

Mettupally Santhosh Reddy , Mastan Reddy Vs… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Telangana HC (2021)

¶1

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶2

i a I : l

¶3

WEDNESDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE G,SRI DEVI

¶6

TRANSFER C RIMINAL PETITION NO:⁶ OF²⁰²¹

¶7

Between:

¶8

Irlettupally Santhosh Reddy @ Ir/astan Reddy, Son of^{late Venkat Reddy,Aged about} 46 years, Occ: Business, resident of Plot No.59, Satya^{Sagar Colony, Vaidehinagar,} Vanasthalipuram' Ranga Reddy District

¶9

...pETrroNER/pETrroNER

¶10

AND

¶11

The State of Telangana, Represented by^{its Public Prosecutor, High Court} Build ings, Hyderabad

¶12

Bathula Jeevan Prasad, Son of^{late Nagaiah,Aged about 48 years, Occ} Business, resident of H.No.9-89, Shiva^{Narayanapuram,Old LordsTalent} School, Badangpet, Saroornagar,^{Ranga Reddy District}

¶13

B.Ramulu Naik; ACP Previously^{workedat ACP Crime Branch, Rachakonda,} Now Working as DSP TSPA,^HYderabad.

¶14

K.Narsing RItfrod, S.l. of Policd,^{Balapur (f), Now working at PCR Police, Control} Room, Rachakonda^,

¶15

P.Saidulu, S.l. of Police, PS^{Pahadishareef (f), Nowhe is as lnspector.ofPolice} a n d wo rki h^g as s H o,^{Ir/ ad} s^{u r, PSI b ra hi m patnflErrrHil=} ffi 8,'ft ["#3iu o =^*r,

¶16

Petition under Section^{407 ol cr.P.c praying that in the circumstancesstated} in the [/emorandum of^{grounds of. TransfercriminalPetition, the High court may be} pleased to transfer the c.c.No.410B of 2018^{pendingon the file of the coufi of ll} I/etropolitan I/agistrate, cyberabad at^{L.B.Nagarto any other Metropolitan} lvlagistrate Court at L.B.Nagar "

¶17

l.A. NO: 1 OF 2021

¶18

Petition under Section^{407(6)of cr.P.cpraying that in the circumstances} stated in the [\4emorandum^{of grounds of Tr.criminla Petition, the High court may be} pllased to stay all further^{proceedings in C.C.No.410Bof 2018 on the file of the Court} ofi t tl Metropolitan Magistrate,^{Cyberabad at L,B Na$ar, pending disposalof the} l TLca.Petition.

¶19

I, Thi,^petition coming on^{for hearing,upon perusing the Memorandumof} Grounds of criminal^{Petition and upon hearing the argumentsof sri P.RAVI} sHANKAR, Advocate^{for the Petitioner and of the Public Prosecutor (TG)on behalf of} the Respondent^{No.1 and of sri Rapolu Bhaskar, Advocate for the Respondent No.2} and of sri c.Hari^{Preeth, Advocate for the Respondent No.3 and none appearedfor} the Respondent Nos.4^{and 5.}

¶20

The Court made the following:^ORDER

¶21

¶22

HONOURABLE JUSTICE^{G. SRI DEVI}

¶23

TRANSFER C^{RIMINALPETITIONNo.6 OF 2021}

¶24

ORDER:

¶25

This Transfer^{Criminal Petition is fited under Section 407 of} Cr.P.C., seeking^{transfer of C.C.No.4108of 2018 on the file of the II} Metropolitan Magistrate,^{Cyberabadat L'B'Nagar, to any other} Metropolitan Magistrate^{Court at L.B.Nagar, Ranga Reddy District'}

¶26

After hearing both^{sides and the matter was reserved "for} orclers", it is brought^{to the notice of this Court that the II} IVletropolitan Magistrate,^{Cyberabadat L B Nagar, has disposed of} thesaidC.C'airleitsjudgmentdaled23.02.202landacquittedthe accused therein,^{who are respondentNos'2to 5 herein' for the} offences punishable^{uncler Sections323,342,290 and506 read with} Section 34 of I.P.C.

¶27

Since C.C.No.4108^{of 2018has already been disposedof' the} cause in the present^{TransferCriminal Petitiondoes not survivefor} adjudication.

¶28

Accordingly, the^{TransferCriminal Petitionis dismissedas} infructuous.

¶29

As a sequel thereto,^{MiscellaneousPetitions, if any,pendingin}

¶30

this Transfer Criminal^{Petition,shall stand closed'}

¶31

Sd/.K.SAILESHI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ,TRUE COPY// h'/i _llo SECTION OFFICER I^1. The ll N,4etropolitan lviagistrate, Cyberabad at L.B.Nagar, Ranga Reddy District Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor (TG), High Court for the State of Telangana, t-'t) Hyderabad (OUT) One CC to Sri P.Ravi Shankar, Advocate (OPUC) lsla One CC to Sri Rapolu Bhaskar, Advocate (OPUC) is. One CC to Sri C.Hari Preeth, Advocate (OPUC) , b. Two CD Copies Kj

¶32

aL' 9- zat^

¶33

H IG H COURT DATED:03/03/2021

¶34

¶35

\o 18 HAB 2021
*
-{t
:i

ORDER

TRCRLP.No.6 of 2021

I '

D SMISSING THE TR.CRL.P.^{AS INFRUCTUOUS.}

¶40

o*-
I z/t
' tt\u"
0)

Mettupally Santhosh Reddy , Mastan Reddy v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mettupally Santhosh Reddy , Mastan Reddy v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mrs. Srujana Mantena Vs Directorate of Enforcement

Dr.Pawan Malhan and another Vs Directorate of Enforcement

Akari Srisailam Vs The State of Telengana

Manchala Sampath Kumar Vs The State of Telangana

The State of a.P., Vs Lingala Mallesh Yadav

S. Sagar Vs The State of Telangana