Disposed

Jathoth Vasuram and 7 Others All Are R/O Maheshwaram, Rr Dt v. Syed Khaleemullah Hussaini R/O Malakpet, Hyderabad

Telangana HC20 Apr 2021TRAS/356/2007

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single judge permitted the withdrawal of an interlocutory appeal (Tr.A.S.No.356 of 2007) and dismissed it accordingly without costs under Section 151 CPC.

What did the court decide?

Petition allowing withdrawal is allowed, and the interlocutory appeal Tr.A.S.No.356 of 2007 is dismissed as withdrawn without costs.

What the court decided

Jathoth Vasuram and 7 Others All Are R/O… — Contract and Commercial Disputes | Telangana HC (2021)

¶1

¶2

HIGH COURT FOR THE SI TE LANGANA AT HYDEJfJiOF

¶3

TUE_qplI, THE TWENIETH DAy oF ApRtL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY Or.re"'-

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM

¶6

l.A.NO .1 F 19 IN/AND

¶7

Tr.A.S .N O:3560F 2007

¶8

IA NO: 10F2019

¶9

Petition under Section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to dismiss the above appeal as withdrawn. Tr.A.S.N O: 356 O F 2007

¶10

Appeal Under Order 4.1 Rule 1 of CpC against the Common Judgment and Decree dated 30.06.2006 in o.S.No.278 of '1999 and o.s.No.216 ot zoo2on the fire of the Court of the I Additional Senior Civil Judge, Ranga Reddy District.

¶11

COMMO N C.T. IN IA.NO.1/2019 & Tr.A.S.No.356/2007

¶12

Betwee n:

¶13

Jathoth Vasuram, S/o. Dhansingh, aged about 69 years, Occ: Ag,cuiture, R/o.

¶14

^^{f aphgquda (V), Maheshwaram Mandat, Rangareddy District.} 2. Jathoth Lokya, S/o. Dhansingh, aged about Sd years, Occ: Agriculture,

¶15

_^{Harshaguda(V), Maheshwaram lr/andal,Rangireddy} Districtl 3. Jathoth Somla, S/o. Jyothya, aged about 52 y-ears, Occ: Agriculture, Harshaguda (V), Maheshwaram Mandal, Rangareddy Distiict.

¶16

1. Jathoth Lalu, S/o. Dhansingh, aged about 54 years, 6cc: Agriculture, Harshaguda (V), Maheshwaram Mandal, Rangareddy Distriit.

¶17

I,4eghavath Sevya, S/o. Keevya, aged about +-S yeari, Occ: Agriculture, Harshaguda (V), Maheshwaram Mandal, Rangaieddy District.

¶18

6 Meghaveth Pulya, S/o. Haria, aged about 52 /ears, Occ: Agriculture

¶19

|,r,4. Ramulu died, Suit abetio against him in Lower Court

¶20

lVleghavath Laxman, S/o. Haria, aged about 50 years, Occ: Agriculture,

¶21

All residents of Harsha Thanda, lr/ankhal Village, Maheshwaram lr/andal, Ranga Reddy District.

¶22

,.,APPELLANTS/DEFENDANTS

¶23

AND

¶24

Syed Khaleemullah Hussaini, S/o. Aulad Hussaini, aged about 58 years, Occ: Business, Rio. 14-1-450, Agapura, Hyderabad, Presently Residing at Ri/o.16-2-143, tr/alakpet, Hyderabad.

¶25

...RESPONDENT/PLAINTIFF

¶26

Counsel for the Appellants: SRl. PRAVEEN KUMAR VEERJALA

¶27

Counsel for the Respondent: ---

¶28

The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER

¶29

THE HON'BLE^{SRIJUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM}

¶30

A.No.1 ol²⁰¹⁹ in/and Tr. .s. o.3⁶ F2007

¶31

COMM N RDER:

¶32

The^{petitionersby filing l'A No 1 ol 2019 pray for withdrawal of} Tr.A.S.No.356^{of 2007. A letter,dated 13 04 202f is also filed to} that effect,

¶33

l,A.No.1 of^{20'1 9 is allowed. Consequently,Tr'A S'No 356 of} 2007 is dtsmissed^{as withdrawn.}

¶34

Itliscellaneous^{applications, if any pending, stand dismissed}

¶35

No costs

¶36

SdI- K.SRINIVAS RAO JOINT REGISTRAR

//TRUE COPY//

SECTION OFFICER

To,

The I Additional Senior Civil Judge, Ranga Reddy.^{(with records,if any)} 2. One CC to Sri. Praveen Kumar Veerjala,^Advocate [OPUC] 3. Two CD Copies

¶42

"\ubr J:_

HIGH^COURT

DATED:^2010412021

COMMON ORDER

l.A.No.1 ot 2019 IN/AND

¶48

1 c. S TA I E.
<, <br>/
11 JUN 20?J
c:t)q
L

¶49

TR.AS.No.356 of 2007

¶50

ALLOWING THE I.A.NO.1/2019 AND DISMISSING THE Tr.A.S. AS WTTHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS

¶51

I 6^)-</sup>

Jathoth Vasuram and 7 Others All Are R/O Maheshwaram, Rr Dt v. Syed Khaleemullah Hussaini R/O Malakpet, Hyderabad

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Jathoth Vasuram and 7 Others All Are R/O Maheshwaram, Rr Dt v. Syed Khaleemullah Hussaini R/O Malakpet, Hyderabad

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

ThotaAnasurya Vs Gandesri Ramesh

Sanjay Chincholiker Vs Smt. K.Dhanalaxmi

Bendram Yellamma Vs Durmutla , Yeshireddy Rajireddy

Sridhar Kiran Cowta Vs Rohan Pravin Shah

Chukka Jagender Vs Chukka Radhamma

Ramesh Kumar Gupta Vs Ramawtar Gupta