Disposed

Chukka Jagender v. Chukka Radhamma

Telangana HC20 Apr 2021CRP/343/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order addresses a civil revision petition. The court noted that the underlying suit had been returned by the lower court as per a status report, meaning no substantive matter survived. Consequently, the revision petition was closed without adjudication, though liberty was granted to file applications to revive it if desired.

What did the court decide?

The Civil Revision Petition was closed with no order as to costs.

Chukka Jagender Vs Chukka Radhamma — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Telangana HC (2021)

¶1

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶2

TUESDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM

¶5

CIVIL REVISION PETITI ON NO: 343 OF 2018

¶6

Petrtion under Arlicle 227 of constitution of lndia aggrieved by lhe order dated 16.11.2017 in 1.A.No.110 of 2016 in o.S.No.9i of 20.15 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, Jagtiyal.

¶7

Between:

¶8

chukka Jagender, S/ o. Late Kistaiah, Age-60 years, occ- Business, Rl/o. H.No.6-6'109, Brahman. Street, Jagtiat Town and 6[tii"t1-""

¶9

...pETlTtoNER/pETlTtoNERypLAtNTtFF

¶10

AND

¶11

'1. Chukka Radhamma W/o. Late Kistaiah, Age_ 74 years, Occ_ Household. R/o.

¶12

H. No. 6-6_83, B rahma nwada, lrgii.jt i"ffi.Z;,a, 6rstrrct.

¶13

Chukka IVahender. a.r^g:^L.1," Kistar3h, Age_ 54 years, Occ_ Business. Rio. H. No.6-6-g3, Brahmanwada, Jagtial Town and drsrrrct.

¶14

Kasala Jayalaxmi, Wr ,,}fr 5 e ye a rs

¶15

o c c - H o^{j je} rr o r o il; .'"M :.,,l::fl il I?,;" :s,'fr.A,jff AiJi f s :; :; Age_ 57 years,

¶16

l,la||iata Rama Devr W/o^Janardhan (D/o. Lare C.Lt!1 {,:Ul"h) s :; :; Age_ 57 years, Occ_ Household. R/o. Shanthinagar. Warangal Town and Distrjct.

¶17

Bakki Uma Ranj, W/o. 3ff Jli,T,"f t i. ; H1," il,,(,TiT J?.ii,3 i", fi i i#&l i^U ?jl,nXpf ;, 0,", ,.,

¶18

,..RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS

¶19

Naspurl Ramesh, S/ o or Jewe,ry

¶20

s ho p, R/o H i,,i, b il.,'Jlfr :lilaXlj;r1i l?lii; ?i? ilif, iiltor

¶21

B, Ganga Sagar, S/o. L K ri s h n a

¶22

K i ra n a ri, ny;: H ril, o dlesi * nffi;:r",r:ili #S#,;fr l"J6or

¶23

Pendotha Bhaskar, S/o o cc_^p rop rieto r o f

¶24

J ewe r ry, t,o ; b;ik ; ;j; J"J*r11,? ?Hf ;ff "di.l,,x?: ^

¶25

r c ro th M e rch a n t

¶26

:'Tffi^{Hls H:il8 lIi,-"J:, !i,l[i,l;fslJ#;s,rm*} rs..,.";c

¶27

"3',$lt*'#r:""J-Hffii1:rffi ;if"rffl,1ffi oritororKiranashop,R/o

¶28

"lloil3'E,liXT,,Il,,%fl l,i,X::Aiairr";__ratrH?fifi ,*E,Si[[i:,

¶29

"^y',! :i,xl6t:^,,ig:gxxf ifl ::: i^g,? "ffi pS gi;.f^{yea rs,} o c c_ B u s i n e s s, R, "

¶30

...RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS

¶31

No.6 to 12IDEFENDANTS No.6 ro .t2

¶32

lA NO: 1 OF 2018

¶33

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to slay all further proceedings in O.S.No.91 of 2015 on the file of the Honourable Senior Civil Judge at Jagtial.

¶34

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. K VENUMADHAV

¶35

Counsel for the Respondent^{Nos.6to 8: SRl. SOURABHAGARWAL}

¶36

Counsel for the^{Respondent No.2: SRl. V. N. ANAGANI}

¶37

The Court made^{the following:ORDER}

¶38

¶39

.I'HE, HON'I]LI, SRI.IUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM

¶40

CIVIL REVISION PETI'IION No.3.l3 of 2018

¶41

OIIDER

¶42

l-his Civil ll.evision Pctitiorr is llled questionirr-e the ordcr dated 16.11.2011dismissing I.A.No.ll0 o1'2016 in O.S.No.9l of 2015 on the flle of Senior Civil Judge, Jagtial.

¶43

It is to be noted that as per the status report of Senior Civil Judge, Jagtial, the said suit itself carne to be returned, by the Court below vide^judgment dated 1 1. 1 0.201 8,

¶44

In those circumstances, nothing survives for adjudication in this Civil Revision Petition.

¶45

Accordingly, this Civil Revision Petition is closed. Hor.r'ever, it is made clear that il an1' ol the parties desire to be hcard, libelty'is given to them to llle an Application to re'"'ive the ILevision and on filing such Application, the tnatter u'oLrld be heard on rnerits.

¶46

Miscellaneor"rs applications, il any pending, shall stand

¶47

closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶48

SDI K. SAILESHI ASSISTANT^REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// (ri'

SECTION^OFFICER

To,

The Senior Civil^{Judge, Jagtiayal}

¶53

One CC to^{Sri. K Venumadhav, Advocate[OPUC]}

¶54

One CC to^{Sri. Sourabh Agarwal, Advocate[OPUC]}

¶55

One CC to^{Sri. V. N. Anagani, Advocate[OPUC]}

¶56

Two CD^CoPies

gbr

HIGH COURT

DATED: 2010412021

ORDER

CRP.No.343 of 2018

)
(l
o
A,3IH *

CLOSING THE CRP

o/
7," )4
t)

Chukka Jagender v. Chukka Radhamma

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Chukka Jagender v. Chukka Radhamma

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

ThotaAnasurya Vs Gandesri Ramesh

Sanjay Chincholiker Vs Smt. K.Dhanalaxmi

Bendram Yellamma Vs Durmutla , Yeshireddy Rajireddy

Jathoth Vasuram and 7 Others All Are R/O Maheshwaram, Rr Dt Vs Syed Khaleemullah Hussaini R/O Malakpet, Hyderabad

Sridhar Kiran Cowta Vs Rohan Pravin Shah

Ramesh Kumar Gupta Vs Ramawtar Gupta