This court disposed of the Income Tax Tribunal Appeal (ITA No. 636 of 2016) on the grounds of withdrawal by the respondent-assessee under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
MONDAY. THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE UJJAL BHUYAN AND
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE P.MADHAVI DEVI
|.T.T.A. NO: 636 OF 2016
lncome Tax Tribunal Appeal under Section 260-4 of the lncome Tax Act, against the order of the lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench 'B' Hyderabad in ITA No.1793/Hyd/2013 for assessment year 2010-11 dated 0910512014 preferred against the Order of the Commissioner of lncome Tax (Appeals)-V, Hyderabad in ITA No.000B/JC-16/C|T(A)-V/2013-14 dated 1610912013 preferred against the Order of the Additional Commissioner of lncome Tax, Range-l6, Hyderabad in pAN No.AAACN7325A, dated 121031201 3
Between:
The Commissioner of lncome Tax-lV, Hyderabad.
...APPELLANT
AND
M/s NN4DC Limited, Khanij Bhavan, 10-3-31 1/A, Castle Hills, Masab Tank, Hyderabad
,.,RESPONDENT
For the Appellant : SRI J.V.PRASAD, Sr. SC for lncome Tax Department
For the Respondent : SRI P.KARTHIK RAMANA, Advocate rep. for
SRI S.DWARAKANATH, Advocate
The Court delivered the following: JUDGMENT
HONOI- RABLESltl JUSTICEUJ'JALllHtlYr\N ANI) TIONOUII \I}LESM'T. JTJSTICEP. MAI)ITAVI I)EVI
l.'l-.T.A.No.6 3(rOF 2016
.lL DCMENT:rlr l'lttnhl, St i ltt\tt'(L 11tlbltt't'tttt
I.leardMr.]V'Prasatl.learnctlstandirigCounsellirrthcallpeliantlrrcontc'[ ax[)el artlncllt and Mr'P Karthikltarnana' leartrcdcounsel Mr.l .Dwarakallath.Icarned counsel Itrr the resllondeut- represcllt lll9 AS SC SSCC
Sd,,-K.SRINIVASARAO .]OINT REGISTRAR
\
/TTRUECOPY//
SEC"IONOFFICER
To 1. Thelncome Tax / ppellateTribunal' Hyderabad.Bench'B' Hvderabad 2. The Commission(r oI rnt6rn"liitApieals)-V'Hyderabad' 3. The Additionatcc nmrssiln;' ;iil;-"i;i;l' naris-e-to' Hvderabad' -sCloi r'r'o"p"rtment (OPUC) /. one cC to Sn l.r .prasai'5i i. SllE ;Ei; $i s*.i '*aiii"h'tn'Advocate(oPUC) 6. TwoCD CoPies
HIGH COURT
DATED:131121202'l
r"a '
tI . .'.i: Sj i-A id:
.1 ) '' O,o-
/,
2 ] ttEf
JUDGMENT
ITTA.No.636 of 2016
DISPOSING OF THEIT 'A AS WITHDARWN WITHOUTCOSTS
-bn
C<br>I w<br>
Commissioner of Income Tax-IV, Hyderabad
M/s NN4DC Limited
Ujjal Bhuyan
P. Madhavi Devi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
