It may be men ioned that petitioner had earlier approached this C-oun byfiling V.P.No.21282 of 202 agaist the order dated 06.08.2021,passed by the Debts Recovery Tribunal-Il, Hlderaba, t (for shon'the Tribunal), retuming the interlocutory application filed by the petitioner for taking into account the One Time Settlement(OTS) arrivedat berween the petitioner and respondent No.1. The said writ petitionwas finallydisposed of on A7 J2.2A21 bv hr lding that Tribunal was not iustified in retuming the interloctnory applicarion filed bythe pettioner where,ifier, the follou,ing direction crme to beissr.red: "CbnsequcnrIr'.,,r'e dircct rhe'fribun to t. c on boud the iruerlocr-nc,ry ,rpplic.rtion filc'r{ bl the peritioner.ud to onsider-tlre sanre irl irccordiurce s'ith lrrl', Jter givirg d.re opporrunity' oi he.rrrng ro .ril the r;rnies. Inteti-ttt orderp:ssed by thisCotur orr08.0c).2021slrrrll be conrinrret{ rill srrc}r ri ne rhe J'ribtur,rl consitler: the irtellocLLton .rpl.lic.rtion Iiled b1' rhe petitiorrer, subiecr r r rhe condition that the petitioner deposits rr lLmhcr irnlounl of P,,s.1,1C,0C,000-00 to r, ;pondent No.l ir respect ol the OTS Schernervithin Ipedod of thift) (30) days from toda)'.</sup> /e nule ir clear thar rle have not expressed im]- opinion on merit rrnd all comenrions are L"p, open. Ve also mlke it clear that once rhe nunter i placed befoie the Tribunal, itis entirelywithin the discretion ofthe Tribunal to pass such o der, as may be deemedfit and proper."
