The High Court Bench dismissed an income tax appeal filed under Section 260 of the Income Tax Act as withdrawn by the appellant who sought to avail benefits under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020.
Appeal dismissed as withdrawn on appellant's request to avail benefits under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR AT HYJ#EABIITEOF TELANGANA
THURSDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE--
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY AND THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE SHAMEEM AKTHER
INCOME TAX TRIBUN AL AP PEAL NO: 354 OF 2008
lncome Tax Tribunar Appear under Section 260 of the rncome Tax Act, against the order of the lncome Tax Appeilate Tribunar, Hyderabad Bench ,A,, Hyderabad in lrA.No.951/Hyd/2007,1or assessment year 2003-2004 dated 29.08.2008 reached by the Appellant on 02.09.2008 preferred against the order of the commissioner of lncome Tax Appeals-Vl, 3'd Floor, Aayakar Bhavan, Basheerbagh, Hyderabad-500004, Appeal No.0165/06-07/lroMd.11(a)/Hyd/ctr(A)-vt-2007-2008 dated i0.07.2007, preferred against the Order of the lncome Tax Officer, Ward.i1 (4), Hyderabad pAN/GlR No. ACWPG4404E dated 31 .03.2003.
Between:
G. Ramanlal, Prop: Balaji Jewellers, Olo.748, AS Rao Nagar, Hyderabad.
..,APPELLANT
AND
The lncome Tax Officer, Ward- 11 [4]Hyderabad,lT Towers, AC Gaurds, Hyderabad
,..RESPONDENT
Counsel for the Appellant: SRIC. V' NARASIMHAM
Counsel for the Respondent:SRI B. NARASIMHA SARMA
The Court delivered thefollowing:JUDGMENT
I
HONOT]RABLESRI JUSTICEA' RAJASHEKER REDDY
AND
TIONOI]RABLEDT.JUSTTCESHAMEEMAKTHIiR
T.T.T. ,No s4 0F 208
JUDGMENTi (PerHon'bte S Justice a' Rajasheker Redddv)
Learnedcounsel for the appellant has a filed a letter seeking withdrawalot this appealon the ground that the appellant wishes to avail the benefitsunder the Direct Tax VivadSe VishwasAct' 2020' introduced bythe Central Government'
2, In that view ofthe matter, this appealis dismissed as withdrawn' No costs
dismissed.
SDi.M,SANTHIVARDHANI JOINT REGISTRAR
\
//TRUE COPY/i
(i,
SECTIONOFFICER
To,
U
HIGHCOURT
DATED:12lABl2021
JUDGMENT
ITTA.No.354of 2008
I E STAT { o
1<
? v
a,j 25 Auc20t1
.,,
'-, * r i,i
's{ll-r1-
DISMISSING THE APPEAL AS WITHDRAWN
G. Ramanlal, Prop: Balaji Jewellers
The Income Tax Officer, Ward-11 (4), Hyderabad
A. Rajasheker Reddy
Dr. Shameem Akther
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
