Dismissed

G.Ramanlal v. Income Tas Officer

Telangana HC12 Aug 2021ITTA/353/2008

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court dismissed an Income Tax Tribunal appeal filed under section 260 of the Income Tax Act as withdrawn by the appellant on the ground that they wished to avail benefits under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020.

What did the court decide?

Interim appeal dismissed as withdrawn on plea of seeking settlement under VATSA 2020. Pending miscellaneous petitions also dismissed.

G.Ramanlal Vs Income Tas Officer — Income Tax | Telangana HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR AT HYDTJREABITTE^{OF TELANGANA}

¶2

THUI:,?IY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF AUGUST TWo THoUSAND AND IWENiY 6NE"",

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE SRIJIUii$::

¶5

TH E HONO U RAB LE DR

¶6

:II",::T:H:"-,"

¶7

tNCO ME TAX TRIB UNAL AP PEAL NO:352 0F 2008

¶8

lncome Tax Tribunal Appeal Under section 260 of the lncome Tax Act, against the order of the lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench ,A,, Hyderabad in lrA No 949/Hydr2o07 Hyderabad 'A' Bench dated 29.08.2008, for assessment year 2001-2002 dated reached by Appellant on 02.09.2008 preferred against the order of the Commissioner of lncome Tax Appeals_Vl, 3d floor, Aayakar Bhavan, Basheerabagh, Hvderabad-500004, Appear No.0163/06-07 rfforwd.11(4)rHyd/crT(A)vl-2007-2008 dated 10.07.2007, preferred against the order of the rncome Tax officer. Ward^'1 1 (4), Hyderabad pAN/ctR No. ACWpG4404E dated 31 .03.200 j.

¶9

Between:

¶10

G. Ramanlal, Prop: Balaji Jewellers, Olo.Z4F.,AS Rao Nagar, Hyderabad.

¶11

.,,APPELLANT

¶12

AND

¶13

The lncome Tax Officer, Ward - 11 [4], Hyderabad, lT Towers, AC Gaurds, Hyderabad

¶14

...RESPONDENT

¶15

Counsel for the Appellant: SRI C. V. NARASIMHAM

¶16

Counsel for the Respondent: SRI B. NARASIMHA SARMA

¶17

The Court delivered the following: JUDGMENT

¶18

HONOURAI}LE^{SRI JUSTICEA' RAJASHEKF]R REDDY}

¶19

AND

¶20

HONOU]TABLE^{DT.JUSTICESHAMEEMAKTHER}

¶21

T.T.^{T.A. No.352 0F2008}

¶22

JUDGMENT^{i (PerHon'bte Sri Justice a'Raiasheker Redddv)}

¶23

Learned^{counselfor the appellant has a filed a letter seeking} withdrawal^{of thrs appeal on the ground that the appellant wishes to avail} the benefits^{under the DirectTax Vivad Se VishwasAct' 2020'} introduced by^{the Central Govemment.}

¶24

in that view of the matter,^{this appealis dismissedas withdrawn'} No costs.

¶25

Pending misceilaneous petitions, if any, shall^{also stand}

¶26

disrnissed.

¶27

"'-'tot'kItT,',+H[ //TRUE^coPY/t (1i,

To,

SECTION^OFFICER

The^{Chairman, lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal Bench.A,,Hyderabad.}

¶32

The^{Commissioner of lncome Tax'3'd floor' Aayakar Bhavan' Basheerabagh'} HYderabad'

¶33

The^{lncome Tax Officer'Ward - 11 [4]' Hyderabad}

¶34

One^{CC to Sri C' V' Narasimham' AdvocateIOPUCI}

¶35

One^{CC to Sri B Narasimha Sarma' Advocate IOPUC]}

¶36

Two^CDCoPtes

¶37

One^{SPare uoPY} obr

HIGH^COURT

DATED:^1210812021

ATE OF I
,i$c <br>I
o
rLl r--ss
co
-ra:-=::=;

¶42

JUDGMENT

¶43

ITTA.No.352^o12008

¶44

DISMISSING THE APPEAL AS WITHDRAWN

G.Ramanlal v. Income Tas Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

G.Ramanlal v. Income Tas Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shikari Mangamma Vs The Debts Recoery Tribunal-2

M/s Akshitha Green Space Lts and another Vs Recovery officer-I and another

M/s. Sree Divya Industries and another Vs The Ministry of Financial Services and 2 others

G.Ramanlal Vs the Income Tax Officer

G.Ramanlal Vs Income Tax Officer

G.Ramanlal Vs Income Tax Officer