The High Court of Telangana disposed of two appeals filed under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act as infructuous. The court accepted the joint submission that the parties had reconciled and resumed cohabitation during the appeals' pendency.
Both appeals were disposed of as infructuous along with pending applications.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
\
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
WEDNESDAY ,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI AND
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.VIJAYSEN REDDY
F.C.A. Nos 114 & 103 OF 2006
F.C.A. NO. 114 0F 2006
Appeal Under Section I 9 of Family Courts Act Judgment and Decree dated 20-02-2006 in F.C.O.P. No. 133 of 2002 on the file of the Court of the Judge, Farnily Court at Warangal.
Betn een:
Nalla Srinivas Rao, S/o. Venkateshwarlu, Employee in APSRTC, R/o.H.No.16-1...APPELLANT/ Petitioner 638, Kareemabad, Warangal. AND
Nalla Naga Rani @ Rani, Wo. Srinivasa Rao, Household, R/o.H.No.16-1568, Kareemabad, Warangal. ...RESPoNDENT/ Respondent
F.C.A. NO. I03 0F 2006
Appeal Under Section 19 of Fanily Courts Act R/w. Order 4lRule i of CPC against Judgment and Decree dated 20-02-2006in O.P. No. 34of 2004on the file of the Court of the Judge, Family Court at Warangal.
Betlveen:
Nalla Srinivas Rao, S/o. Venkateshwarlu, Employeein APSRTC,R/o.H.No.'16-1- ...APPELLANT/ Petitioner 638, Kareemabad, Warangal. AND
Nalla Naga Rani @ Rani, W/o. SrinivasaRao, Household, R/o.H.No.'l 6-1- ...RESPONDENT/ Respondent 568, Kareemabad, Warangal.
Counsel for the Appellant in both: SRIBANKATLALMANDHANI
Counsel for the Respondentin both :SRl J. VENKATESWARREDDY
The Court delivered the following:Judgment
I
Items No.57-58
THE HO N,BLE THE CHIEF JI.ISTICE HIMA KOHLI ANI)
THE HON'BLE SRI JL;STIC]F] I}. \ I.'.\ SI.-\ IT[,DDY
[-.C.A.\os.l l.l & t03 0f 2006
C()II I'ION J Ll DC M ti r..1- :(Pcr thr llon'blc thr:( hicl Justice llinra Kohli)
l. Learned counscl tbr the partiesjointll stirte that the present appeals have been rendered infl'r.rctuous. tbr the reason that during the pendency thereot, the parlies have reconciled their disputes and have reunited and are living together fbr the past eight years.
applications, if any.
Sd/-K.SREENIVASA RAO JOINT R GIST
\
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION FFICER
To 1. The Judge, Family Court , Warangal( with records ) 2. One CC to SRI BANKATLAL MANDHANI, Advocate [OPUC] 3. One cc to Sri J.Venkateswar Reddy, Advocate(OPUC) 3. Two CD Copies
',
HIGH COURT
HCJ& BVRJ
DATED:2410212021
COI[}!ON JUDGMENT
FCA.Nos .114 & 103 of 2006
-')
flt''
\ 1 H E s tA
z
3 ,18 t',lIH 202.|
t *
DISPOSING OF THE BOTH APPEALS AS INFRUCDTUOUS
/,/
n
1 issue framed by the court
Whether appeals in matrimonial disputes become infructuous upon reconciliation and resumption of cohabitation.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Nalla Srinivas Rao
Nalla Naga Rani
Hima Kohli
B. Vijaysen Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
