This revision petition under Article 227 and Section 151 CPC was dismissed for default and non-prosecution as the petitioner remained absent without filing any representation during the hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURTFOR THE STATEOF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
WEDNESOAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OFDECET,IBER rWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A,VENKATESHWARAREDDY
CIVIL REVISIO N PETITION NO: 4104 OF 2014
Petition under Arlicle 227 of Constitution of lndia, aggrieved by the Orderdated 2310912014 in lA No.236/20'14 in lA No.549/2013 in OS No.129/2013 on thefile of the Court of the Junior Civil Judge, lvlahabubnagar.
Between:
R.Venkat Sharma, Son of Kistaiah, aged about 68 years, Occ: Agriculture, restdent of Nawabpet Mandal, Mahabubnagar District.
...PETITIONEFI/PETITIONERYOEFENDANT
AND
CRPMP. NO: 5620 0F 2014
Petition under Section 151 of CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the common order dt.23-09-2014 passed in 1.A.No.287 of 2O14 in l.A No.549 of 2013 in O.S.No.129 of 2013 on the file of Junior Civil Judge, Mahabubnagar.
For the Petitioner : SRI V.PADMANABHA RAO, Advocate
Forthe Respondents : SRI M.DAMODAR REDDY, Advocate
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE H(,N'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.VENKATESHWAF.A REDDY
7
C.R.P.NO.4 104 0F 0t4
ORDER
Leamed cou rsel for the petitioner called absent. No representarion
Learned cou sel for the respondents present
This revision is directed againsr the orders in I.A.No.2g7 of 2(ll4 in 1.A.No.549 ot' 2013 in O.S.No.129 of 2013 dated 23.09.2014 on the file ol lcamed Junior Civil Judgc. Mahabubnagar, wh re-under the application iiled by the pla;ntiflis secking fbr appointment of an Advocate Commissioner to visit rhe land in Sy.No.757 ol Yenrnangandal villal : of Nawabpet mandal, to note down the existing physical f'eatures of road in Sy.No.75? was allowed by the court below by fixing the f'ee. Aggricvetl by the said orders, the de'endant preferred this revision.
Since the petit oner / defendant remained absent without any representation, I find no merit to adjoum tl e matter. Accordingly, the civil revision petition is dismissed for default, and for non pr lsecution.
lnterim order I anted earlier stands vacated.
As a sequel all he ir.rterlocutory applications stand closed, No older as to costs.
Sd/.K,ONESIM ASSISTI\NT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPYII
SECTION OFFICER
To 1 The Junior Civil Juc le, Mahabubnagar,Mahabubnagar District. (with records, if any)
Kj
N>
HIGH COURT
DATED:1511212021
ORDER
CRP.No.4104ol 2014
!^E S rAr A.
(J'
o
(-) 2 2 JAN 2022
)t
*
\ \ 4
I
oF. ,! 16
DTSMISSINGTHECRI 'FOR DEFAULT'
\O ) tg^"d
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the civil revision petition under Article 227, being undefended by the petitioner due to absence, requires court consideration or can be dismissed for default?
2 provisions across 2 enactments
R.Venkat Sharma
J.Venkat Laxmamma
R.Dasaratha Ramulu
Justice A. Venkateshwara Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
