The High Court disposed of a Civil Revision Petition under Article 226 and a petition under Section 151 CPC as withdrawn by the petitioner citing a previous Supreme Court judgment.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
\
AT HYOERABAD
WEDNESDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.VENKATESHWARA REDDY
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 189 OF 2019
Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of lndia aggrieved by the order in E.P.No.'1 14 ol 2017 in O.S.No.310 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the ll Additional Senior Civil Judge, Ranga Reddy District at L.B.Nagar.
Betwee n:
A. Damodar Reddy, S/o. Late Sri A. Prathap Reddy, aged about 49years, Occupation: Business, Fi/o. H.No.2-4-211, RoadNo.9-8, SnehapuriColony, Hyderabad.
...PETITIONERYDECREE HOLDER (PLAINTIFF)
AND
Kondal Rao Gajawada, S/o. Sd Laxmi Rajam, Occupation: Business, R/o.Flat No.102, Sai Residency, H.No.4-1 16, Opp- DPS School, Durga Nagar, Dilsukhnagar, Hyderabad.
...RESPONDENT/JUDGMENT DEBTOR (DEFENDANT)
lA NO:'l OF 2019
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may bepleasedto direct the executing court i.e., ll Additional Senior Civil Judge, R.R. District to Adjudicate EP.No.11412017 consequently execute the decree dated.29-04-2017 in the suitin OS.No.310/2009on the file of the ll Additional Senior Civiljudge, R.R. District.
Counsel for the Petitioner: M/S. BHARADWAJ ASSOCIATES
Counsel for the Respondent: SRI T. ASHOK REDDY
The Court made the following: ORDER
HONOURAB],E SRIJUSTICE A.VENKATESHWARA REDDY
CIVI], REVISION PETITION No.189of 2Ol9t
ORDER:
Learned :ounsel for thepetitioner submitteda letter dated 13.12.2021 in tl e Registryfor withdrawal of CRPstating that as per the instructionsrf client,the matter was decidedin S.A.No.33 ol 2O2O on O2.O7.2O2O.
In viev of the same, this CivilRevision Petitionis disposed of as w thdrawn.Pending miscellaneousapplications,il any, shall stand close 1.
SD/.K.ONESIM ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
To,
,TRUE COPY//
ly-
SECTION OFFICER
HIGH COURT
DATED: 1511212021
1.6E STafa; o.
..,) 29 ,l[]l2q?2
ORDER
CRP.No.189 o'2019
DISPOSING OF THE CRP AS WITHDRAIryN WITHOUT CO JTS
2 provisions across 2 enactments
A. Damodar Reddy
Kondal Rao Gajawada
A. Venkateshwara Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
