Revision Petition challenging an IA granting interim stay was filed. The Court held the lower court's order was bereft of reasons and contrary to Shiv Kumar Chadha. It was set aside and remanded for fresh disposal within three months.
Impugned order set aside and matter remitted for fresh disposal expeditiously within three months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
i
l_]
1 I
I
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF DECEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR
CIVIL REVI SION PETITION NO: 1203 OF 2021
Petition under Ar.icle 227 of Constitution of lndia, aggrieved by the order dated 2416121 in lA No.552/2021 in OS No.53212O21 on the file of the Court of the Sub Divisional Magistrate, and Special Assistant Agent to Government, Mobile Court, Bhadrachalam.
,I
| AE | IWTEN: |
|---|---|
| ). t |
Smt. Karri@PerumallaMuthyalamma,WoSomireddy, Aged about55years, Occ:KiranaBusiness, R/o H,No.6-106,Beside PadmasaliBazar, RaghuTheatreRoad, CharlaVillage &Mandal, Bhadradri Kothagudem District. |
| r'/z. | KafiiSomireddy, S/o Sathireddy, Agedabout59years,Occ:Contractor, R/o H.No.6-106,Beside PadmasaliBazar, RaghuTheatreRoad, CharlaVillage&Mandal, Bhadradri KothagudemDistrict. ...Petitioners 0-5'"-e'1 AND |
| ",/1 | .NarayanaNataraja, S/oSubbarayalu, Agedabout44Years,Occ:EmployeeinSBI, R/o KukunooruVillageofKoppalaDistrict, Karnataka State,TemporarycamedowntoBhadrachalam R/o H.No.7-13,Padmasali Bazar,RaghuTheatreRoad, Charla Village&Mandal,Bhadradri KothagudemDistrict. elr-- |
| 2 | .Gaddam Sai,S/oNagaraju, Agedabout35years,Occ:Carpenter, R/oBeside Padmasali Bazar,Charla Village& Mandal, Bhadradri KothagudemDistrict. |
| 3 | .Perumalla PrabhakarRao,S/oLate Ramarao, Agedabout60years,Occ:Business, R/o H.No.6-106,BesidePadmasaliBazar, Charla Village&Mandal,Bhadradri Kothagudem District' |
| ( | Respondents No. 2&3areproformapartiesandnotnecessary tothispetition) n n |
I
:!_-}c.-.:.:-:-
+.--.::-E+-
\ \
I I
lA NO: 1 OF 2021
Petition under Sr ction 151 of CPCpraying that in the circuntstances statedin the affidavit filed therev ith, the High Court may bepleased to suspend theoperation of orders passed in l.A. '1o.552 of 2021 in O,S.No.532/2021 ,dated',2410612021onlhe file of the Sub-Divisior al N/agistrate and Special Assistant Agent t() Government, Mobile Court, Bhadrach llam.
For the Petitioners : S[ I K.SARATH, Advocate
Forthe Respondent Nr .1 : SRI C.RAGHU, Advocate
The Court made the foll< wing: ORDER
1 \
\ I
I
HONOURABLESRI JUSTICE T'VINODKUMAR CIVIL REVISIONPETITI ON No.1 203 of 2021
ORDER:
Heard leamedcounsel for petitioners and learned counsel for l'r respondent.
I(1993) 3 scc 161
\
7 As sucl , on remand, the Court below is directed to dispose of I.A.No.552 o, 2021 in O.S.No.532 of 2021 pending on its file as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of three (03) months from t Le date of receipt of a copy of this order.
\
closed.
Sd/.K.VENKAIAH ASSIS'TANTREGISTRAR //TRUECOPY' h.' L,/ SECTIONOFFICER
I
HIGH COURT
DATED:0311212021
N
t.^*
'a+\.(/ \2
? 3 0Ec?fil t)
:-/
t' ';
:-:
ORDER
CRP.No.1203ol 2021
DISPOSINGTHECT P
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the impugned order despite being bereft of reasons is liable to be set aside under Article 227 of the Constitution.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Shiv Kumar Chadha & ors v. Municipal Corp. of Delhi (1993) 3 SCC 161 · Who else cites this
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Smt. Karri Perumalla Muthyalamma Somireddy
Kaffi Somireddy
Narayana Nataraja
Gaddam Sai
Perumalla Prabhakar Rao
T. Vinod Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
