This criminal revision case challenged the dismissal of an application seeking forensic analysis to determine the age of ink on a cheque. The High Court dismissed the revision, finding no merit and confirming the lower court's order that no technology exists to determine ink age in this context.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
MONDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DT. JUSTICE SHAMEEM AKTHER
CR IMINAL REVIS ION CASE NO: 18 OF 2021
Criminal Revision Case under Sections 397 & 401 of Cr.p.C against the Judgment made in crl.MP No.5575/2019 in cc No.'t 78412018 dated o2lo3tzo2o onthe file of the court of the XV Additional Judge -cum- XIX Additional chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Secunderabad.
Between:
Sri. S. Ravi, S/o.Raghavulu,
...PETITIONER
AND
Hyderabad, PONDENTS
IA NO: 2 OF 2021
Petition under section 482 of cr.P.c praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of grounds of Criminal Revision Case, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in c.c.No . 1784 ol 2b18 on the file of the XV Additional Judge-cum- XtX Additional chief Metropolitan Magistrate. Secunderabad.
For the Petitioner : SRI V.K.SHIVA SHANKAR, Advocate
For the Respondent No.1: Dr. B.MANOJ KUMAR, Advocate
For the Respondent No.2 : PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
The Court made the followrng: ORDER
THE HON,BLE DT. ]USTICE SHAMEEM AKTHER
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.18 of 2021
ORDER
This Criminal Revision Case, under Sections 397 and 401 of Code of Criminal Procedure, L973, is filed by the petitioner/accused, challenging the order, dated 02.03.2020 passed in Crl,M.P.No.5575 of 2019 in C.C.No.17B4 of 2018 by the XIX Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Secunderabad, whereby, the petition filed by the petitioner/accused under Section 243(2) of Cr.P.C. seeking permission to send Ex.p1 and Ex.D3 to the handwriting expert to determine the age of the ink found thereon, was dism issed.
2
determine the age of the ink and ultimately prayed to allow the criminal revision case as prayed for,
Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
Sd/.CH.VENKATESWARLU DEPUTY REGISTRAR ,,/ //TRUE COPYII _,, SECTION OFFICER
HIGH COURT
DATED:2511O12O21
ORDER
f tr9 $, TAf.t o
o
q z
oo 24 Ntzt}?l C;
t orsp'.;:r,.''
:==r}
CRLRC.No.18 ot 2021
DISMISSING THE CRL.R.C.
l",L )-o
.--;/a_)-
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court should exercise its revisional powers to quash the lower court's order dismissing the application for handwriting and ink age analysis.
Whether there is any perversity or patent error on the face of the record regarding the denial of forensic analysis of the cheque.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
S. Ravi
B. Vikas Kumar
The State of Telangana
SHAMEEM AKTHER
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
