Dismissed

Sri.Chowdavarapu Nageshwar Rao v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC25 Oct 2021CRLP/4282/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single judge disposed of three miscellaneous petitions challenging an Order acquitting accused Nos. 2 to 4. The benches granted permission to withdraw the Criminal Petitions under Section 482 Cr.P.C. due to compromise and dismissed them accordingly.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw the Criminal Petition granted. Criminal Petition No. 4282 of 2021 dismissed as withdrawn.

Sri.Chowdavarapu Nageshwar Rao Vs The State of… — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

¶2

AT HYDERABAD

¶3

MONDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE DT. JUSTICE SHAMEEM AKTHER

¶6

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 4282 OF 2021

¶7

Between:

¶8

Sri.Chowdavarapu Nageshwar Rao, S/o. Late Sri.Venkanna,

¶9

Smt.Chowdavarapu Sandhya Rani, W/o. Chowdavarapu Nageshwar Rao.

¶10

Smt.Kommuri Alekhya, W/o. Sri.Kommuri Satyakanth, ...PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NOS.2 TO 4/RESPONDENTS tN vAcATE PETTTION (1 TO 3)

¶11

AND

¶12

The State of Telangana, Rep.by its Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad

¶13

.....Respondent

¶14

Smt.Gandam Ramya Shilpa, D/o. Sri.Gandam Nageshwar^Rao

¶15

...RESPONDENT/DEFACTO COMPLAINANTA/ACATE PETITIONER

¶16

Petition under Section 482 ol Cr.P.C^praying that in the circumstances^stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court^{may be pleased} to^quash Cr.No.44412021 , Dated^{2310512021on the file Uppal Police Station for the} alleged offences under Sec.498-A, 420 R/w. 34 of^{IPC and Sec.4 of Dowry} Prohibition Act against the Petitioners/ Accused^{Nos.2, 3 and 4.}

¶17

l.A. NO: 2OF 202'l

¶18

Petition under section 482 of^{cr.P.cpraying thatin the circumstancesstated} in the Memorandum of Grounds^{of criminalPetition, the High courtmay be pleased} to stay all further^{proceedings in cr.No.44412021, Dated 23.05.2021 on the file Uppal} Police station for the^{alleged offences under sec.498-A,420 R/w. 34 of IPC and} Sec.4 of Dowry Prohibition^{Act against the Petitioners/AccusedNos'2,3 and 4,} including the^{personal appearanceon every dateof hearing}

¶19

LA. NO :3 OF²⁰²¹

¶20

Petition under^{section482 of cr.P.cpraying thatin the circumstancesstated} intheMemorandumofGroundsofcriminalPetition,theHighCourtmaybepleased tovacatetheinterimStayordersgrantedinCrlPNo.4282of202ldatedS161202l

¶21

This Petition^{coming on for hearing, upon perusingthe Memorandum of} Grounds of^{Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri T'NATRAJ'} AdvocateforthePetitionersandofthePublicProsecutoronbehalfofthe RespondentNo.landofSriDadiRadhaKrishna,AdvocatefortheRespondentNo.2.

¶22

The Court made^{the following: ORDER}

¶23

THE HON BLE^{DT. JUSTICE SHAMEEM AKTHER}

¶24

CRIM] NAL PETITION^{NO.4282OF 2021}

¶25

ORDER:

¶26

Learned col^nsel for^{the petitioners/A2 to A4 would submit} that the subject^{n atter was compromised betweenthe parties and} seekspermissionlfthisCourttoWithdrawtheCriminalPetition.

¶27

Permission s accorded ' 2,

¶28

3 Accordingly the^{Criminal Petitionis dismissed as withdrawn'}

¶29

tvliscellanec us^{petitions, if any, pending in this Criminal}

¶30

Petition, shall stand^closed.

¶31

Sd/-B,SATYAVATHI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPYi/

¶32

, SECTION OFFICER

¶33

¶34

1 The lll Metropoli an Magistrate, Cyberabad, at L.B.Nagar. 2 The Station Hou;e Officer, Uppal Police Station, Uppal, Cyberabad. a Two CCs to the^)ublic Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana, Hyderabad (OU") 4 One CC to Sri T Natraj, Advocate (OPUC) 5 One CC to Sri D rdi Radha Krishna, Advocate (OPUC) 6 Two CD Copies 7 One Spare Copr

l<t )=-

HIGH COURT

DATED:2511012021

ORDER

1 e STArts
(
c
i 1 B tlo{?o?l
,i
*
k t c, c
!

¶40

CRLP.No.4282 of 202'

¶41

DISMISSING THE CRI.,P. AS WITHDRAWN

¶42

\
S

Sri.Chowdavarapu Nageshwar Rao v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sri.Chowdavarapu Nageshwar Rao v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Are Srinivas and 16 Others Vs The State of Telangana and another

Vajrala. Therojamma and another Vs The State of Telangana and another

Mirkuri Bhumanna and Another Vs The State of Telangana and Another

Sri.S. Ravi Vs Sri. B. Vikas Kumar

Mr.Vejju Balaji Vs State of Telangana and another

N.Naveen, Hyd Vs P.P., Hyd and Ano