Dismissed

Shaik Mohammed Saleem alias Mahaboob v. State of Telangana

Telangana HC14 Dec 2021CRLP/8868/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court entertained a criminal petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of an FIR where investigation was completed but final report not immediately acted upon. The petitioner sought to withdraw the petition while retaining liberty to challenge the charge sheet. The court granted this request, dismissing the petition as withdrawn.

What did the court decide?

Criminal Petition dismissed as withdrawn, granting liberty to question the charge sheet.

Shaik Mohammed Saleem alias Mahaboob Vs State of Telangana — Quashing and FIR | Telangana HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶2

TUESDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF DECEIVBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN

¶5

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 8868 OF 2021

¶6

Between:

¶7

Shaik Mohammed Saleem @ Mahaboob, S/o Shaik Mohammed Khaja, aged 52 Years, Occ. Business Ri/o H.No.9-2-99, A Battery Lines, Bazar Ghat, Hyderabad.

¶8

...PETITIONER/ACCUSED

¶9

AND

¶10

State of Telangana, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad

¶11

Sub-lnspector of Police, Central Crime Station (CCS), Chair Duty, D.D. Hyderabad.

¶12

...RESPONDENTS

¶13

Assistant General IVanager, State Bank of lndia, RACPC - 5. Abids, Hyderabad - 500001.

¶14

...DEFACTO COMPLAINANT/RESPONDENT

¶15

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the cjrcumstances stated in the [,4emorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to call for records relating to FIR No.45 of 2018 on the file of Central Crime Station, Hyderabad and quash the same.

¶16

l.A. NO: 1 OF 2021

¶17

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the l,4emorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay of all further proceedings including arrest of the petitioner in FIR No.4S of 2018 on the file of Central Crime Station, Hyderabad.

¶18

This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri V. V. Raghavan, Advocale for the Petitioner and the Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent Nos.1 & 2 and of the Respondent No.3 not appeared either in person or by Advocate.

¶19

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶20

¶21

THE HONOURABLE^{SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN}

¶22

CRIMINAL PETITIO N^{No.8868 of 2O2l}

¶23

ORDER:

¶24

Learned Public Prosecutor^{placed on record the photo} copy of the case^{detailsof the subject matter and the same is} made as part of^{the record.}

¶25

From a perusal of the^{same, it is revealed that the} investigation was^{completed, finai report was filed beforethe} concerned Magistrate^{and it was numberedas C'C'No'8438of} 2021.

¶26

Learned counsel for^{the petitioner seeks permission of} this Court to withdraw^{the presentpetition with a libertyto} question the very charge^{sheet itself.}

¶27

Accordingly, the Criminal^{Petition isdismissedas} withdrawn,^{granting libertyas sought.}

¶28

Miscellaneous^{petitions, il any, pending in this criminal}

¶29

petition, shail stand^closed,

¶30

SD/.N.CHANDRA^{SEKHAR RAO} ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

¶31

,TRUE COPY'

¶32

SECTION OFFICER

¶33

To, 1. The Station House Officer, CCS, Hyderabad . ^- 2. One CC to^{Sri V. V. Raghavan, Advocate-LoPu-ul} 3. i;; 66.L]h.;^{FruiiCF'o."cutor,Highcburt foitnestate of Telansanaat} Hyderabad. [OUT]

¶34

Two CD CoPies 5. One Spare^CoPY obr

HIGH COURT

DATED: 1411212021

ORDER

CRLP.No.8868 of 2021

1 E s r4r::
,/
( oa-
':)
(.('].
t)
0 4 J,$i2022 C:
,+

¶41

DISMISSING THE CRL.P AS WITHDRAWN "

¶42

{y \" 9c\ o

Shaik Mohammed Saleem alias Mahaboob v. State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shaik Mohammed Saleem alias Mahaboob v. State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Syed Afzal Ali Vs The State of Telangana

Seema Tarannum Vs The State of Telangana

Yerram Srikanth Reddy Vs The State of Telangana

D. Ramesh Vs State of Telangana

Rajendra Hanumanthu Nangre Vs State of Telangana

Kshatriya Vinay Kumar Singh Vs The State of Telangana