Dismissed

Mamidipally Srinivas Reddy v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC25 Nov 2021CRLP/8707/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court dismissed Criminal Petition No. 8707 of 2021 as withdrawn. The petitioners sought to quash proceedings in FIR No. 196 of 2021. The Court granted leave to withdraw the petition with liberty to work out remedies upon a charge sheet.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw the petition granted with liberty to work out remedies in case of charge sheet filing.

Mamidipally Srinivas Reddy Vs The State of… — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

¶2

AT HYDERABAD

¶3

THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH^DAY OF^NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY^ONE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE DT. JUSTICE SHAMEEM^AKTHER

¶6

CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 8707 0F 2021

¶7

Between:

¶8

Ir/amidipally Srinivas Reddy, S/o. Ram^{Reddy, Aged about} .41^years, Occ. Agriiulture, FJo. Choudarigudem^{Village,KeshampetMandal, Ranga} Reddy District.

¶9

Mamiilipally Vijender Reddy, S/o,^{Pochi Reddv,egg9qUpql 33} vears' Occ.Agiicuiture, R/o. Cnoudaiigudem^{Village, Keshampet Mandal, Ranga Reddy} District.

¶10

N/amidipally Praveen Reddy,^{S/o. Chenna Reddy, Aged about 32 years,} Occ.Driver, R/o. TNGOs Colony,^{Kattedan,Hyderabad.}

¶11

Mamidipatly Ravinder Reddy,^{S/o. Sat Reddy,ngqa qQotll.!!years,Occ. Auto} Driver, iVo. Sriram Colony,^{jalpally Village. Ranga Reddy District.l-}

¶12

tr/amidipally Sudarshan^{Reddy,S/o. Ramchandra Reddy, Aged about 43 years,} Occ. Auto Driver, Fl/o. TNGOs^{Colony, Kattedan,Hyderabad.}

¶13

lr/amidipally Ayyapu Reddy,^{S/o. Rama Reddy, aged 36 years, Occ.AutoDriver,} R/o. Rio. rNcos corony,^{Near warer rani.} IEliif,,8_E[l?S3our=o No.1 ro⁶

¶14

AND

¶15

1 . The State of Telangana,^{throughPS Keshampet, CyberabadPolice} Commissionarete, Represented^{by PP, HighCourt at Hyderabad.}

¶16

Mamidipally Ashok^{Reddy, S/o.Biddy, Aged 48 years, Occ.Agriculture} R/o.Ch6udlrigudem Village,^{Keshampet Mandal, Rangareddy District'}

¶17

... RESPONDE NTS/COMPLAINANTS

¶18

Petition under Section 482^{of cr.P.c praying thatin the circumstancesstated} in the Memorandum of^{Grounds of criminal Petition, the High courtmay be} pleased to quash the^proceedings in^{FIR No. 196 of 2021 of PS Keshampet'} Ranga Reddy District.

¶19

l.A. NO: 1 OF 202]

¶20

Petition under section^{482of cr.P.c praying that in the circumstancesstated} in the Memorandum of^{Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased} to stay all further^{proceedingsin FIR No. 196 of 2021 o1 PS Keshampet,} Ranga Reddy District.

¶21

ThisPetitioncomingonforhearing'UponperusingtheMemorandumof Grounds of criminal^{Petition and upon hearing the arguments of lvl/s. Deepak Misra'} Advocate for the^{Petitioner and the Public Prosecutor on behalfof the Respondent} No.landtheRespondentNo.2notappearedeitherinpersonorbyAdvocate.

¶22

The Courl made the^{following:ORDER}

¶23

¶24

¶25

THE HON'BLE Dr.^{JUSTICE SHAMEEM AKTHER}

¶26

CRIMINAL PETITION^{No.87O7OF 2O21}

¶27

ORDER:

¶28

This Criminal Petition,^{underSection 482 of the Code of} Criminal Procedure,^{1973, is filed by the petitioners/A.1 to A'6} seeking to^guash the^{proceedings againstthem in Crime No'196} of 2O2l of Keshampet^{PoliceStation, Cyberabad, registered for} the offences under^{Sections 143, 148, 447, 427, 504, 506 r/w} 149 iPC.

¶29

Heard both sides. Perused^{the record.}

¶30

Having made submisslons for a^{considerableperiod,} learned counsel for the^{petitioners/A.1to A.6 soughtpermission} of the Court to withdraw this^{Criminal Petition with a liberty to} the petitioners/A.1 to A.6 to work out^{the remediesavailable} under law, in the event^{of filing of charge sheet.}

¶31

Granting such liberty, this Criminal^{Petition is dismissedas} withd rawn^,

¶32

Miscellaneous Petitions, if any,^{pending in this Criminal}

¶33

Petition shall stand closed.

¶34

SD/.K.ONESIM

¶35

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ,TRUE COPY//

¶36

SECTION OFFICER

¶37

To,

¶38

The Judicial First Class Magistrate, Shadnaqar.

¶39

The Station House Officer, keshampet p.S.]Cvberabad.

¶40

I 9re^{CCto Vt/s.Deepak Misra,} Adv6cate fO'pU'Ci 4. Iwo CCs to the^pubric prosecutor, High court foi tne State of rerangana at Hyderabad. IOUTI

¶41

Two CD Copies 6. One Spare Copy gbr

$u.

HIGH COURT

DATED: 2511112021

ORDER

CRL.P.No.8707 of 2021

¶47

HE A14
o B
it, 0 g Dtc202J ''<br>f ,:-

¶48

DISMISSING THE CRL.P AS WITHDRAWN

¶49

(

Mamidipally Srinivas Reddy v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mamidipally Srinivas Reddy v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Addanki Hemanth Kumar , Raju and 2 others Vs The State of Telangana and another

Patan Khadar Khan Vs The State of Telangana and another

Rakesh Niranjan Ranjan Vs State of Telangana

Maloth Laxmi Vs State of Telangana

Sampangi Ramulu Vs The State of Telangana

Genupula Rama Krishna alias Genupala Ramakrishna Reddy Vs The State of Telangana