Dismissed

I Shiva Kumar and 4 Others v. The State of Telangana and Another

Telangana HC23 Dec 2021CRLP/8672/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single Judge, HC Telangana disposed of a Criminal Petition filed to quash complaint/investigation under CrPC sections. The Court granted liberty to withdraw, dismissed the petition as withdrawn, and closed miscellaneous proceedings.

What did the court decide?

Petition dismissed as withdrawn after granting liberty to withdraw to file fresh petition challenging charge-sheet.

I Shiva Kumar and 4 Others Vs The State of… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Telangana HC (2021)

¶1

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶2

THURSDAY ,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN

¶5

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 8672 OF 2021

¶6

Between:

¶7

I shiva-Kumar,. s/o. Late Isukapaily_satyanarayana, (president) aged about 63 y_:1i1 g._!!p.!on. Setf ,Emptoyed, Restd'ent of'Viild No.41, noi,at-parmi,-eiriji layout, GaJularamaram, Hyderabad 500055.

¶8

srinivas^u Ambati, s/o. Late Mo_han Rao Ambati, (vice president) Aged about 43 I!-rl,tt _O*^{Private Emptoyee, Residentof Vi[a Nd.15, Royat patrirs,-Bataiifuvort,} GaJularamaram, Hyderabad 500055.

¶9

Kasireddy Vishnu vardhan Reddy, s/o. Narayana Reddy, (secretary), Aqed about 35 Years, Occ.Businesss, R_.^riqe_lr of viila'ru0.80, airyit parms,'aarjjilJyout, Gajularamaram, Hyderabad 500055.

¶10

Shankar Ve_nkataraman, S/o.Venkataraman, (loint Secretary) Aqed about 43 Years, occ.Private Emproyee, Resident of Viila No.6B, Royar parms] Baraji rayout, Gajularamaram, Hyderabad 500055.

¶11

varanasi santeeswara R1o, s/o.sivacharan, (Treasurer) Aged about 39 years, Occ.Private Emptoyeer, Resident_of Viila N6.39, noyal datms,--aitaji fayori, Gajularamaram, Hyderabad 500055.

¶12

...PErrTroN ER/ACCUSED(S)

¶13

AND

¶14

The State ofTeiangana and Another, Through SHO, pS Jeedimefla, Rep by public Prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad.

¶15

y.glqndr? f"lo_ul! Mala_gi.ng_Directgr of M/s.Guru Raghavendra Infra Devetopers f$,^{1t9., R/o,3-6-199,5th Floor, K.Narsimha Estates] Himayathnagar,'} Hyderabad, Telangana State.

¶16

... RESPON DENT/COM PTAINANTS

¶17

Petition under Section 4371438/4391482 of Cr.p.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal petition, the High court may be pleased toto quash the complaint and investigation in crime No, 582 of 2021, dated 1210712021 of PS Jeedimetla, Cyberabad, against the Petitione rslAccused No.1 to 5 and grant

¶18

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2021 :-Petition under Section 482 of Cr.p.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings against the Petitioners/Accused No.1 to 5 herein in crime No. 582 of 2021, dated 1210712021 of PS Jeedimetla, Cyberabad, including appearance of the petitioners/Accused No.1 to 5 pending disposal of the main criminal petition, and grant

¶19

This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the argumenti of sri K. RAIASHEKAR ,Advocate for the Petitioners and the^public prosecutor on behalf oF the Respondent No.1 and of None appeared for the Respondent No. 2

¶20

The Couft made the following: ORDER

¶21

¶22

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN

¶23

AL PE ION N -467 2 0F 2)O2L

¶24

ORDER:

¶25

The le rrned public prosecutor, on instr:uctions, would submit that the Investigating Officer in Crime No.5g2 of 2021 pending on 1.,e fiIe of Jeedimeetla police station, cyberabad has already coml rleted investigation and filed charge: sheet and the same was giv :n C.C.No .22T of 2O2l .

¶26

In view rf the same, the learned counsel for petitioner seeks permission tc withdraw the criminal petition rvith a riberty to fire fresh petition challenging the very charge sheet itself.

¶27

Grantin,l liberty as sought for, this criminal petition is dismissed as vithdrawn. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any,

¶28

shall stand clr sed.

¶29

//TRUE^COPY I I

¶30

SD/-V.KAVITHA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR rt

¶31

SECTION OFFICER

¶32

To,

¶33

The )Cfi Metropolitar Magistrate,^{Medchal Cyberabad}

¶34

The Station Hduse O ficei, Jeedimetla,^{Police Station leedimetla,Cyberabad}

¶35

One CC to SRI K. R/IASHEKAR^Advocate [OPUC]

¶36

Two CCs to PUBLIC I^{ROSECUTOR, HighCout for the State ofTelangana at} Hyderabad IOUT]

¶37

Two CD Copies

¶38

BS (, o'r'e :Po-ze^{C- )P'/}

.b--

HIGH COURT

DATEDt2S l L2l2O2L

ORDER CRLP.No.8672 of^2O2l

¶43

zffiF.)<br>1 1 ,l$I 282?
\ ;?
:=-

¶44

¶45

DISMISSING THE^{CF IMINALPETITIONAS WITHDRAWN}

¶46

¶47

I Shiva Kumar and 4 Others v. The State of Telangana and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

I Shiva Kumar and 4 Others v. The State of Telangana and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bandla Jaganmohan Reddy Vs The State of Telangana

K. Gopi Vs The State of Telangana

Balakavi Sai Vikram Vs The State of Telangana

Sandhya Vs The State of Telangana

J. Raju Vs The State of Telangana

Tungala Laxmi Raghava Vs State of Telangana