In Criminal Petition No. 653 of 2016, filed for quashing of a complaints case under Cr.P.C. 482, the High Court held that the subject matter of the petition had become infructuous and dismissed the petition accordingly.
Petition dismissed as infructuous; miscellaneous petitions, if any, closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
IMONDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE SHAMEEM AKTHER
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 653 OF 2016
Betwee n:
K.Ramesh Kumar, S/o. K.Krishna Reddy, aged 50years,
registered office at Door No. 18-1-668, Bhavani Nagar, Tirupati, Chittoor District.
AND
...RES'.NDENTD(..M'LA'NANT)
Petition under Section 482 ol Cr.P.Cpraying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may bepleased to quash CC.No. 525 ot 2012 on the file of the Vlll Special Magistrate,Hyderabad at E rrama nzil.
CRLPMP. NO: 620 OF 2016
Petition under Section 482 ol Cr.P.C praying that in the clrcumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may bepleased to stay of all furtherproceedings in CC.No. 525 of 2012 on the file of theVlll Special Magistrate, Hyderabad at Erramanzil,pending disposal of thequash petition.
This Petition coming on for hearing, uponperusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri N.SUBBARAO, Advocate for the Petitioners and of the Additional Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1
The Court made the following: ORDER
/
THE HON'BLE DT. JUSTICESHAMEEM AKTHER
CRIMINALPETITION No'653OF 2O16
9BDEB:
Learned counselfor the petitioners/accusedrvould submit thatthesubjectmatterofthisCriminaIPetitionhasbecome infructuous.
Miscellaneouspetitions,ifany, pending in this Criminal
Petition, shall standclosed.
SdIK.AMMAJI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ,TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
oill cc to Sri N.SubbaRao,Advocate(oPUc)
J.
4.t Two CD Copies One SpareCoPY
Kj
{
HIGH COURT
DATED:1811012021
{
1 {e sur €
/<
a'
I
oo 0? NoYr{ln l)C
"/r, t
?..
^ a-aD;'rc
ORDER
CRLP.No.653 of 2016
CLOSED.
XI
fr4
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the subject matter of the quashing petition has become infructuous and if so, whether the Criminal Petition should be dismissed.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
STERLING TRANSFORMERS
L.ANANTA RAM REDDY
K.RAMESH KUMAR
STATE OF TELANGANA
P.N.R.GUPTA
DR. JUSTICE SHAMEEM AKTHER
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
