This is a brief order dismissing a quashing petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C because the challen ged trial concluded with an acquittal on 01/03/2017.
Criminal petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
MONDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE SHAMEEM AKTHER
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 514 OF 2016
Between:
...PETITIONERS/A1 & A2
AND
Petition under Section 482 ol Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the proceedings in CC.No. 865 of 2015 on the file of the Hon'ble Vlll Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad at Rajendranagar.
CRLPMP. NO: 509 OF 2016
Petition under Section 482 oI Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in CC.No. 865 pf 2015 on the file of the Hon'ble Vlll Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad at Rajendranagar.
This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri N.KRISHNA SUMANTH, Advocate for the Petitioners and of the Additional Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLEDT. JUSTICESHAMEEMAKTHER
I
I
CRIMINALPETITION NO.514 OF 2016
ORDER:
This CriminalPetition, under Section48? of the Code of CriminalProcedure,lgT3,isfiledbythepetitioners/A1andA2, seeking toquashthe proceedings againstthem in C'C'No'865of 2015 on thefjle of learnedVIII MetropolitanMagistrate' Cyberabad atRajendranagar,wherein cognizance was taken for the offencepunistableunder Section 354 of I'P'C'
Z. Heard.Perused the record'
MiscellaneousPetitions, if any, pending in this Criminal
Petition shallstandclosed.
Sd/-K.ONESIM ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// & SECTION OFFICER
To 1. The Vlll MetropolitanMagistrate, Cyberabad' at Rajendranagar'. i: i;; dis'i;'t#FrblicPrisecutor,ilish Court for the State of relangana' Hyderabad(OUT) e. oirl-cd to Sri N.KrishnaSumanth, Advocate (OPUC)
ttdk
HIGH COURT
DATED:'18/10/2021
OROER
I ?- L4
&*
u
u) *
s
,'14r o
01
do so
s
/
!:
c H9tt"
CRLP.No.514 of 20't6
CLOSED.
on'S,
2 issues framed by the court
Whether criminal proceedings should be quashed when the trial has concluded with an acquittal.
Whether a criminal petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C survives after the charge sheet is filed but the trial ends in acquittal.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Pavan Kumar Aganirral
Mohd. Faiz Khatin
The State Telangana
Kum.Anjali Patale
Shameem Akther
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
