Disposed

Mr.lmtiyaz Ahmed and another v. State of Telangana and another

Telangana HC11 Aug 2021CRLP/6142/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of a petition under Section 482 CrPC seeking quashing of compounding proceedings. Instead of quashing, the Court granted the restricted prayer to dispense with the personal appearance of the petitioners before the trial court except on dates when specifically required.

What did the court decide?

Personal appearance of petitioners before the XIV Additional Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad, dispensed with except on dates when presence is specifically required by the Court.

Mr.lmtiyaz Ahmed and another Vs State of Telangana and… — Dowry and Cruelty | Telangana HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF^TELANGANA

¶2

AT HYDERABAD

¶3

WEDNESDAY, THE ELEVENTH^{DAY OF AUGUST} TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE^{G SRI DEVI}

¶6

CRIMINAL PE^{TITIONNO t61420F 2021}

¶7

Between:

¶8

1 Mr.lmtivaz Ahmed,^{S/o. Late. Abdul Salam,.Aged about 30 years' OccPrivate} 5;il;3," fi':"ir.itro.+-srl'-n""dr.rpitiv^{'Viliase, chouduiuGrampanchavat} Nawab6et Mandal,^{Mahaboobnagar District}

¶9

2 Mrs. Booran Bee,^{W/o. LateAbdul Salam, Aged about 67 years' Occ Household'} FJo.H.No.4-81,^{nangampatiy"Vifrg",bt.]6uduru GrampanchayatNawabpet} Mandat, Mahaboobnagar^District.

¶10

..'Petitioner/Accused^{No'1 and2}

¶11

AND

¶12

State of Telanqana,^{representedby the Public Prosecutor'HighCourt of} Hyderabad foithe^{State of TelanganaHyderaDao'}

¶13

2 Smt. Mohd^{Ashiya, W/o. lmtiyaz Ahmed,Age-d28 years' Oc-c Beautician'} il;:S;i;;';i^{Viiiiil",snur.'nabadMandal, Ransa Reddv District'}

¶14

...Respondents/ComPlainant

¶15

PetitionunderSection4S2olCr,P,Cprayingthatinthecircumstancesstated intheMemorandumofGroundsofCriminalPetition,theHighCourtmaybepleased toquashtheC.C.No.3llTof2o2OpendingonthefileofXlVAdditionalMetropolitan Magistrate,^{Rajendranagar, Cyberabad, against the petitioners'}

¶16

l.A. NO: 1 OF 2021

¶17

PetitionunderSection4E2olCr.P.Cprayingthatinthecircumstancesstated intheMemorandumofGroundsofCriminalPetition,theHighCourtmaybepleased todispensewiththefillingofcertifiedcopyofChargesheetinC.C'No.3117o1|2020 on the file of^{XIV Additional Metropolitan Magistrate Cyberabad Rajendera Nagar'}

¶18

l.A. NO: 2 OF²⁰²¹

¶19

PetitionunderSection4B2ofCr.P'Cprayingthatinthecircumstancesstated in the Memorandum^{of Grounds of Criminal Petition'the High Court may be pleased} tostayallfurtherproceedingsagainstthepetitionershereininC.C.No.3llTot2020 pendingonthefileofXlVAdditionalMetropolitanMagistrate'Cyberabad'Rajendra Nagar^{pending disposal of the Criminal Petition'}

¶20

This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Pramod Singh, Advocate for the Petitioners and the Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.'l , and the Respondent No.2 not appearing in person or by Advocate.

¶21

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶22

HONOURABLE JUSTICE G. SRI DEVI

¶23

CRIMINAL PETITION NO.6142 OF 202¹

¶24

ORDER:

¶25

This Criminal Petition is filed under Section^{482 of the Code} of Criminal Procedure seeking^{quashing of the proceedingsin} C.C.No.3 i 17 ol 2O2O on the^{file of the XIV Additional Metropolitan} Magistrate, Cyberabad, Rajendra^Nagar.

¶26

A charge sheet came to^{be filed against the petitioners/A-1 &} A-2 for the offences^{punishableunderSection498-A of the Indian} Penal Code read with Sections 3^{and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition} Act.

¶27

Though the present Criminal^{Petition isfiled seeking} quashing of entire proceedings, but^{learned counselfor the} petitioners/A-1 & A-2 restricts his^{prayer seekingdispensationof} the presence of the^{petitioners/A-1 & A-2 beforethe trial Courton} every date of adjournment.

¶28

The learned Public^{Prosecutor submits that since the} identity of petitioners/^A- I^{& A-2 is not in dispute, their presence} in the above. case may not^{be necessary on every date of} adjournment.

¶29

Having regard to the facts^{and circumstances of the case, the} personal appearance of the^{petitioners/A-1 & A-2 in C'C'No'3117} of 2O2O on the file^{of the XIV Additional Metropolitan Magistrate,} Cyberabad, Rajendra^{Nagar, is hereby dispensed with excepton} the dates when their^{presenceis specificallyrequired by the Court'}

¶30

With the above direction,^{the Criminal Petition is disposed of'}

¶31

¶32

Miscellaneous applications, if any, pending shall stand

¶33

closed.

¶34

Sd/.K.ONESIM ASSISiTANT BEGTSTRAR \ //TRUE COPY// C1' SECTION OFFICER

¶35

¶36

¶37

The XIV Additional^{Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad,RajerndraNagar'}

¶38

The Station House Officer,^{RGI Airport Police Station Cyberebd'}

¶39

Two CCs to the Public^{Prosecutor, High Court for the State cf Telangana,at} Hyderabad [OUT]

¶40

One CC to Sri Pramod^{Singh, Advocate} [OPUC]

¶41

Two CD Copies

¶42

One Spare Copy

HIGH COURT

DATED:1110812021

OROER

CRLP.No.6142 of 202'l

¶48

L S TA r€
1
oo 2 6 AUG 2021 t1
* +

¶49

DISPOSING OF THE CRIMINAL PETITION

¶50

Mr.lmtiyaz Ahmed and another v. State of Telangana and another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mr.lmtiyaz Ahmed and another v. State of Telangana and another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sri.Alam Vs State of Telangana

Smt. Meenu Agarwal Vs State of Telangana

Ms. Drishti Agarwal Vs State of Telangana

Medipally Bharath Kumar Reddy Vs The State of Telangana and 4 others

Srimalla Shivashanker and 4 others Vs The State of Telangana and another

Kagada Kunal Singh Vs The State of Telangana