Disposed

Srimalla Shivashanker and 4 others v. The State of Telangana and another

Telangana HC11 Aug 2021CRLP/5504/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of a petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of an FIR. The Court directed the investigating agency to comply with the guidelines laid down in the Arnesh Kumar case rather than granting the specific relief sought regarding quashing or stay.

What did the court decide?

Directed the police to abide by the directions of the Apex Court as set out in Arnesh Kumar case.

Srimalla Shivashanker and 4 others… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Telangana HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR

¶2

OF TELANGANA AT HYDTJR1B1ITE

¶3

WEDNESDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE G. SRI DEVI

¶6

CRIMIN AL PETITION NO: 5504 0F 2021

¶7

Between:

¶8

1 Srimalla Shivashanker. S/o.S.Narayana. aged about 33 years. Occ: Nrl, R,o.prot 1 o5, BVD ro*"r-i' cot,iE&"yffi iJr "s,nsu,eddy rown Sa nga

¶9

I3.1:;r:..1l.yo

¶10

2 Srimalla Anasuva. W/o.S Narayana. aged about 61 years. Occ: Housewife, R/o H No. 1 2-36,' t,4eerpet. t-lyOeiabad.

¶11

3 [rt:?:i'"X^{w/o Venu' aged-about 36 vears,occ: Housewif e, Rlo.2-317,Nagote,} 4 Srimalla Dhana Laxmi. D/o.S.Narayana, aged about 41 years, Occ: Advocate, q R/o.Flat Ponnam Sunitha, tlq t-99, Hi-Tech W/o.Venkatelh, .aged city, Hyo6iioidl"-- about^"-""' 33 years, Occ: Housewjfe F/o.H.No.5-52, L.B.Nagar, HyOeraOiO. "-...PETITIONERS/PETITIONERS

¶12

AND

¶13

1 The State 9ou{f9r^{State of} of retanoana.^T-etangani, Rep^{at'HvAeraOia.} qy its.pubric prosecutor,^--"--*" High^' court Buirding, High

¶14

2 Smt.Srimalla Shivaleel, W/o.Srimaila Shivaiumar, aged about 27 years, Occ . Pvt Employee Presently Residing at H.No 5-14, Neai Cram pancfi;yaib?;;, Bibipet Village and lVlandal, Kam"areddy D strici --^{-'DENTS/RESpONDENTS}

¶15

Petition under section 482 of cr.p.c praying that in the circumstances stated in the Nrlemorandum of Grounds of criminal petition, the High court may be pleased to call for the records relating to the impugned proceedings in FIR No.67 of 2019, on the file of the P.S.Bibipet to Kamareddy, Telangana and declare the same as illegal and unlaw.ful, and quash the same in limini and in to as against the petitioners/accused No.1 , 3 to 6.

¶16

LA. NO: I OF 2021

¶17

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the [Vlemorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further investigation including appearance of the petitioners/accused No.1, 3 to 6 in FIR No.67 of 2019, Before the P.S. Bibipet, Kamareddy, Telangana pending disposal of the above criminal petition and such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.

¶18

This Petition coming on for hearing, upon^perusing the^{lvlemorandum of} Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments^{of Sri KattaLaxmi} Prasad, Advocate for the Petitioner and the Assistant Public^{Prosecutor(TG) on} behalf of the Respondent No.1 and none appeared for the Respondent^No.2.

¶19

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶20

l\ ^. -..' ,,,'

¶21

HONOURABLE^{JUSTICE G' SRI DEVI} CRIMIN ALP ETITI^ONNo.5504 o F 2021

¶22

ORDER:

¶23

This Criminal^{Petition is filed under Section482 ()f the Codeof} criminat^{Procedure (cr.P.C.) seeking quashing of in"estigatton in} Crime No.67^{of 2ol9 of P.S. Bibipet,Kamareddy, regis;teredagainst} the^{petitioners/A-1, A-3 to A-6 for the offences punishable under} Sections^{406,323,506IPC ofthe Indian Penal Code and Section and} 156(3) of^{the Code of Criminal Procedure'}

¶24

Though the^{learned counsel for the petitioners/A-1' A-3 to A-6} filed the^{present petitionfor quashing of investigationinthe} abovementioned^{crlme, he restrictshis prayer seekinga direction to} tl-re lnvestigating^{agency to follow the procedure prescribedunder} Section 41-A of the^{Cr.P.C. and the guidelines prescribsd by the Apex} Court in Arnesh Kumar^{u, State of Bihar and anotherl'}

¶25

l,earned Assistant^{PublicProsecutor r'vorlldsr' bmit that the} clircctions of the Apex^{Court have to be followedaLnd irplemented'}

¶26

ln that view of the matter, the^{CriminalPetitionis disposed of} directing the police to abide by the directions^{of the Apex Courtas set} out in Arnesh Kumor case^(suPra).

¶27

Miscellaneous applications, if any,^pending shall^{stand closed.} '^{AtR 2014 sc 2756}

¶28

Sd/.B.SATYAVATHI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// C,,,

¶29

SECTION OFFICER

¶30

To,

¶31

1 The Addjtional Judicial First Class Magistrate (Special Mobi e) at Kamareddy, Nizamabad, Nizamabad District.

¶32

2 The Station House Officer, Bibipet Police Station, Kamared<ly District.

¶33

a One CC to Sri Katta Laxmi Prasad, Advocate IOPUC]

¶34

4 Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT]

¶35

5 Two CD Copies

¶36

6 One Spare Copy

¶37

s br

HIGH^COURT

DATED:^1110812021

ORDER

'r
S c
I t\ts
o
.t5
I B ruc$tl
:
n': ^ P.D5 C)

¶43

CRLP.No.5504^{of 2021}

¶44

DTSPOSING OF THE CRIMINAL^PETITIOhI

Srimalla Shivashanker and 4 others v. The State of Telangana and another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Srimalla Shivashanker and 4 others v. The State of Telangana and another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sri.Alam Vs State of Telangana

Smt. Meenu Agarwal Vs State of Telangana

Ms. Drishti Agarwal Vs State of Telangana

Medipally Bharath Kumar Reddy Vs The State of Telangana and 4 others

Kagada Kunal Singh Vs The State of Telangana

Mr.lmtiyaz Ahmed and another Vs State of Telangana and another