Allowed

Bommi Reddy Tirupathireddy v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC12 Aug 2021CRLP/5481/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Telangana granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner under Section 438 CrPC in a cheating case involving a finance loan default. The judge fixed specific conditions including surrender within 15 days and appearance before the investigating officer.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted subject to conditions: surrender within 15 days, post-bail bond of Rs. 1 lakh, appearance before Investigating Officer every Friday until charge sheet filing.

Bommi Reddy Tirupathireddy Vs The State of Telangana — Cheque Dishonour | Telangana HC (2021)

¶1

N N $

¶2

[^3ls8 ]

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶4

THURSDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE

¶5

:PRESENT:

¶6

THE HON'BLE JUSTICE G.SRI DEVI

¶7

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 5481 OF 2021

¶8

Behveen:

¶9

ommi Reddy Tirupathireddy, S/o. Balreddy,

¶10

Petitioner/Accused

¶11

AND

¶12

TJre State ofTelangana, rep. by Public Prosecutor, High Court ofTelangan4 at Hyderabad.

¶13

' Respondent

¶14

Petition under Sections 438 of Cr.P.C, praying that in the circumstances stated in the petition and the grounds filed therein, the High Court may be pleased to enlarge the petitioner on .-.bail in the event of his arrest in connection with FIR. No. 347 of 2020 dated 24-ll-2020 on the file of PS Adbullapumret, Rachakonda District, in the interest ofjustice;

¶15

The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the petition and the grounds filed therein, and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Rajagopallavan Tayi, Advocate for the Petitioner, and of the Asst. Public Prosecutor, for the Respondent, the Court made the following.

¶16

¶17

THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE G. SRI DEVI CRIMINAL PETITION N 0.5481 of 2021

¶18

ORDER:

¶19

The Criminal Petition, under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, is filed by the^{petitioner/accused} seeking to grant anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest in connection with Crime No.347 ol 2020 on the file of Abdullapurmet Police Station, Rachakonda District, registered for the offence under Section 420 lPC.

¶20

the 2. Heard learned counsel appearing for

¶21

petitioner/accused, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent-State and perused the record.

¶22

The prosecution case is that the petitioner/accused having availed vehicle loan from the finance company of de-facto complainant failed to pay the installments and also prepared fake sale deed purposefully and maliciously with an intention to sustain loss to the company

¶23

Learned counsel for the petitioner/accused would submit that the petitioner has paid two EMls and failed to pay fufiher EMls and that the mortgaged vehicle has been taken over by de-facto complainant on^"l 9. 1 1 .2020. He would also submit that the petitioner is not having any criminal antecedents prior to the alleged occurrence and he is a law abiding citizen and ready to abide by any condition that may be imposed in the event of his enlargement on anticipatory bail.

Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner

¶28

6 Having regard to the facts and circumstances and looking into the nature of allegations leveled against the petitioner, without delving into the merits of the matter, lam inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner/accused.

¶29

Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is allowed and the petitioner/accused is granted anticipatory bail subject to the following terms and conditions:

¶30

(i) The petitioner/accused is directed to surrender before the Station House Officer, Abdullapurmet Police Station, Rachakonda District, within a^period of 15 days from today, and on such surrender, the said Station House Officer shall release the petitioner/accused on bail on his executing a personal bond to the tune of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees one lakh only) with two sureties to the like amount each to his satisfaction.

¶31

(ii) On such release, the^{petitioner/accused} shall appear before the lnvestigating Officer on every Friday between 9.00 AM and 5.00 PM,, till completion of investigation and filing of the charge sheet.

¶32

(iii) The petitioner/accused shall comply with the conditions as laid down under Section 438^{(2) o'f} Cr.P.C.

¶33

B. Miscellaneous petitions, if any^pending in this criminal^petition,

shall stand closed.

"r-.r}.

//TRUE COPYII

Sd/- T"TIRUMl\t'A^DEVI ASSISTANT g,/^RE,GISTRAII

¶38

SECTION OFFICER

¶39

¶40

& To, 1. The XXIV Addl. Metropolitan Magistmte, Rachakonda, Hayathnagar. 2. The Station House Officer, PS Abdullapurmet, Rachakonda District. 3. Two CCs to Public Prosecutor, High Court of Telangana, at Hyderabad^(OUT) 4. one CC to Sri Rajagopallavan Tayi, Advocate (OPUC) 5. one Spare Copy

HIGH COURT

<br>I

GSD,J

DATE: l2-8-2021

ORDER

CRL.P. NO.548r OF 202r

¶47

$
=$
<br>

¶48

PETITION ALLOWED

Bommi Reddy Tirupathireddy v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bommi Reddy Tirupathireddy v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Medipally Bharath Kumar Reddy Vs The State of Telangana and 4 others

Srimalla Shivashanker and 4 others Vs The State of Telangana and another

Kagada Kunal Singh Vs The State of Telangana

Medipally Bharath Kumar Reddy Vs The State of Telangana

State of Telangana , Rep by the Pp., Vs Meerza Ahmed Baig , Amzad Baig, Kataram (M).

Battikadi Narasimha Goud Vs The State of Telangana