The High Court dismissed a petition under Section 492 CrPC seeking quashing of an FIR. The Court noted the case details revealed the matter had already been compromised in Lok Adalat on 26.09.2020, rendering the petition infructuous.
Criminal petition dismissed as infructuous; subsequent miscellaneous petitions closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR Ar HYDr#lBltrEoF TELANG.ANA
FT?TY, THE TENTH DAY OF DECEMBER rwo THoUsAND AND rwerliiE,rrr"j^
THE HoNouRor.J5*t,ttlt rcE K. LAK'HMAN
c IM NALPE lTto NN i 408 02
Betwe en
1 Ronak Mundra S/o. Late Shlvprakash Mundra. R/o, 5-9-30/1 /t7A, palace C"fory,-" ',!.,u,o/ uasheerbagh, Hirnayatht retangana-iooour"'""'nunar' Hyderabad'
2 Suresh l(umar Agarwal S/o. Late Chiman Lal, R/o. 5-9-30/1 /LzA, palace Colony, Basheerbagh, Himayathnagar, Hyderabad, Telangana-500063
AND
...Petitioners/Accused No.1,2, 3 & 4
...Respondent
..,Respondent/ m t
Petition under section 492 of cr.p.c praying that in the circumstances stated in the [Memorandum of Gro-unds of criminar petitioi, the High co"rt rrv ne pr"as"o to quash the FrR No.99/2020, dated. 1 1lo2l2o2o registered-by tne snaonajai notice Station against the petitioners ,
l.A. NO:2 OF 2020
Petition under section 492 of cr.p.c praying that in the circumstances stated in the [r,4emorandum of Grounds of criminar petitio;, the High co*t rrv o" pr"ur"o to permit the petitioners and respondents to compromise in terms tf ru,tou ot, 19.03.2020 between accused No. 1, 2, 3 and 4 and Defacto comprainani and golqgund the offence by quashing FtR No.99 of 2o2o Dr.1i-02-2020 on the fire of P.S.Shadnagar,
| Ir,t | l.A.NO:3 OF2 | 020 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | etw N.Sa *lo.i Hyde I |
een:'> jj0ahS/o. N'Sadasivarao tietMIG-1237,serilingampally' rabad. ..Petitioner/ResPondentNo'2 |
||
| And 1 I I |
RonakMundraS/o'LateShivprakash Mundra' R/o.5-9-30/U17A,PalaceColonY' Basheerbagh,Himayathnagar,Hyderabad' Telangana-500063 |
|||
| 2. | Suresh KumarAgarwalS/o.LateChimanLal, R/o.5-9-30/1/17A,Palace ColonY, Basheerbagh,Himayathnagar,Hyderabad, Telangana-500063 |
|||
| 3 | Vlneet AgarwalS/o.AudeshChandAgarwal, Rlo.B-2-293IBZIA/7 89,RoadNo.36, Jublee Hills,Hyderabad,Telangana-500033. |
|||
| 4. | Raju KumarS/o,RallaBandiVenkataRama Raju, P-28,PrakruthiNivas, DundigalAirforceAcademy, Annaram,MedakDistrict.T.S, |
|||
| .Respondents/AccusedNo,1,2,3&4 | ||||
| I4._ , int toc Sta |
5 | The StateofTelanganarep.by itsPublicProsecutor,HighCourt of ludicatureofTelangana atHyderabad. |
||
| inthr top( 19.03 |
I t |
ing,"1,1uror i;;r;;;;i." Shadnagar Pol |
anO6ofGroundsofCriminal Petition,theHigh Court may bepleased ir,"c"."inFtRNo.ss;l2ozo,dated:11t02t2020resistered bythe iceStation againstthe petitioners herein' |
|
| s6rnP P.S.S |
ThiSP Groundsofc IVUNDRA,A n".pono"nt.lt the'Responde No.SlZOiOa Crl.P.No.40B7 |
etitioncomingonforhearing,Uponperusingthelvlemorandumof riminalPetiti"onanduponhearingtheargumentsofsriDAlt4oDAR dvocateforthePetitionersinCrl.P,No.4087l2o20andforthe o4inlANo'3ot2O2OandofthePublicProsecutor(TG)onbehalfof ntNo.1incrl.P.No.40 87l2O2Oandfor theRespondentNo.5inlA ndsrisourabhAgarwal, Advocatefor theRespondentNO.2in l2020andforthe petitionerinlANo 3 of 2020' |
The Court made thefollowing: ORDER
,:.
THE I{ON'BLE JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN
CRIMINAL PETITIONNo,4oa7 et2o20
ORDER:
Learned public prosecutor placed on record a letter dt.26.07.2021 in respect of the case details of the subject matter and the same is made as part of the record.
A perusar of the same, it is revealed that the case has been corrlpromised before Lok_Adalat on 26.09.2O2O.
In view of the same, this Criminal petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this criminal
petition, sha1l stand closed.
Sd/-N,CHANDRASEKHAR RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
,TRUE COPY'
Qll;
SECTION OFFICER
To
A)
HIGH COURT
DATED:10/1212021
ORDER
CRLP.No.4087 of2020
/"i"-?"-h<br>//t t'
rJ {
,q \J. 2 5 JAN 2022 I
r\ 'n
\r."i, \s;1 -' )
DISMISSING THE CRL.P. AS INFRUCTUoUS "
I -2i
/ AY IT PLEASE YOUR HONOU R
It is submitted that the petitioners and the Respondents/Accused No.2, 3, 4 and 5 have settled the matter amicably out of court in the above case and in view of the settlement irrived at between the parties, the Respondent No,2 does not want to proceed with the above case and he does not have any objection toquash theproceedings in the above case.
It is, therefore, most humbly, prayed that thisHon'bleCourt may be pleased to quash the proceedings in view of thecompromlsearrivedat between theparties inFIR No.99/2020,dated: 11.02.2020 registeredby the Shadnagar Police Stati<inagainst the petitionersherein in the interestof justice and pass such other order ororders as this Hon',ble courtdeems fit in the interest ofjusticeand in the circumstancesof the case'
;r
COUNSEL FOR THE PETITIONE
{r ,,
$'."/,
I
o?*rro.. I-JSED +
co UNSEL FOR RESPON
NO.1,2,3&4
$o
c NSELFOR RESPONDE NT NO.2/DEFACTO CoMPLAINANT 54YJ mi 4,
Place,:HYderabad. Date (v')5 .08.2020.
o"4 cfu{64/*
I
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the criminal petition should be dismissed as the case had already been compromised in Lok Adalat.
Whether the High Court should quash FIR No.99/2020 in view of the settlement.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ronak Mundra
Suresh Kumar Agarwal
Vineet Agarwal
Raju Kumar
State of Telangana
K. LAKHMAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
