Dismissed

Debbedi Mallesham, v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC9 Dec 2021CRLP/351/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners filed a criminal petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of proceedings under IPC and SC/ST (PO) Act. The court dismissed the petition as infructuous because the final report had already been filed by the investigation agency with the Magistrate.

What did the court decide?

The criminal petition was dismissed as infructuous since the final report was already filed before the Magistrate.

Debbedi Mallesham, Vs The State of Telangana — Quashing and FIR | Telangana HC (2021)

¶1

HIGH COURT FOR^{THE STATEOF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD}

¶2

THURSDAY, THE NINTH^{DAY OF DECEMBER} TWO THOUSAND AND^TWENTYONE

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE^K.LAKSHMAN

¶5

CRIMINAL PETITION No. 351^{OF 2021}

¶6

Between:

¶7

Debbedi Mallesham, S/o.D. Satyanaruyana^{l- Aged 25 years,Occ' Agriculture} Cootie Att are Rio^{tvlunidevunipalli Vittage, KondapurMandallt/andal,} Sangareddy District

¶8

Pala Buchaiah @ P.^{Naveen Goud, S/o Sayanna Goud Aged about 23 years,} Occ. Agriculture Coolie

¶9

Burra Bhaskar, s/o^{Burra Krishna Goud Agedabout 27 years, occ. Agriculture} coolie

¶10

Julakanti Narsimulu,^{S/o Ambaiah Aged about 60 years, Occ Agriculture,}

¶11

Julakanti Shankar, S/o^{Narsimulu Aged about 34 years, occ. Agriculturelabor}

¶12

Shiva Goud, S/o^{Pata Shankaraiah Aged about 23 years, occ. Agriculture labor}

¶13

Debbadi Parmesh, S/o^{Ramaiah Aged about 40 years,Occ.Agriculture labor}

¶14

Pata Srinivas Goud,^{S/o Anjaiah Goud Aged aboul 42 years,Occ Agriculture} coolie

¶15

(All are R/o Munidevunipalli Village, Kondapur l,4andal lt/andal, Sangareddy District)

¶16

..,,PETITIONERS

¶17

AND

¶18

1 The State of Telangana, Rep^{by S.H.0,P S Kondapw SangareddyDistrict} Through Public Prolecutor,^{HighCourt,Hyderabad,Telangana.}

¶19

2 Ir,4ala Prabhavathi, W/o Balaiah^{Aged about50 years, Occ. Coolie,} R/o Munidevunipally Village,^{Kondapur Mandal SangareddyDistrictTelangana}

¶20

...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANTS

¶21

Petitjon under section 482 of cr.P.c^{praying that in the circumstancesstated} in the N/emorandum of Grounds^{of criminal Petition, the High courtmaybe pleased} to quash the^proceedings in^{Crime No 09/2021 on the file of P SKondapur,} Sanqareddy District for the^{offences U/s 323, 324, 5O4 of IPC and 3(1Xr) and} 3(1Xva) of SC/ST POA Act

¶22

l.A. NO: 1OF 2021

¶23

Petition under section 482 of cr.P.c^{praying that in the circumstancesstated} in the lvlemorandum of Grounds of criminal^{Petition, the High courtmay be pleased} to grant interim stay of all further^{proceedings, includingarrest of the petitioners in} Crime No Ogl2O21 on the file of^{P.S. Kondapur, Sangareddy District for the offences} U/s 323, 324,504 of tPC and^{3(1)(r) and 3(2) (va)of SC/ST POAAct, pending} d isposa I of the Crl.P

¶24

This Petition coming on for^{hearing, upon perusingthe lt4emorandum of} Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon^{hearing the arguments of Sri SrinivasReddy} Balakisti, Advocate for the Petitioners^{and the PublicProsecutoron behalf of the} Respondent No.1 and of None appeared^{for the RespondentNo. 2}

¶25

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶26

THE HONOURABLE^{SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN}

¶27

CRIMI NAL^{PETITION No.35L of 2O2L}

¶28

ORDER:

¶29

Learned Public^{Prosecutorplaced on record the photo} copy of the^{case detailsof the subject matter and the same is} made as Part^{of the record'}

¶30

From a^{perusalof the same, it is revealedthat the} investigation^{was completed, final report was filed before the} concerned^{Magistrateand it was numbered as Spl'SC'No'83} of 2021. In^{view of the same, the subject matter in the} Criminal Petition^{has becomeinfructuous'}

¶31

Accordingly, the^{Criminal Petition is} dismissed^as infructuous,^{grantingliberty to chailenge the final report' if} so, advised.

¶32

Misceilaneons^{petitions, if any, pending in this criminal}

¶33

petition, shalI^{stand closed}

¶34

SD/. K.AMMAJI ASSISTANT^REGISTRAR ,TRUE COPY'

¶35

SECTION^OFFICER

¶36

To,

¶37

.l.ThestationHouseofficer,Kondapur,PolicestationKondapur'MedakDistrict -sr.iniuat nedov eaiat<isti, Advoc€te [oPUC] i. o;"-iCi;^sr.i 5, fir" C-Ct't"^{the-Public p,o-s#utoi' High'Court for t6e State of Telanganaat} Hyderabad [OUT]

¶38

Two CD^CoPies

¶39

One SPare^CoPY

¶40

\ V

HIGH COURT

DATED:0911212021

ORDER

1 6E STA I;:
I
+\
d (a g o DE[?l?t

¶45

CRLP.No.351 o12021

¶46

DISMISSING THE CRIMINAL PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS

¶47

'1-<br>Z+ 1?-

Debbedi Mallesham, v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Debbedi Mallesham, v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Manya Naveen Vs The State of Telangana and another

K.Tejaram Murthy Vs The State Of Telangana, And Another

Shaik Kareemuddin Vs The State of Telangana

K. Shiva Reddy, Vs The State of Telangana

Mr.Ravinder Singh Oberoi Vs The State of Telangana, And Another

Thallapaka Praveen Kumar Vs The State of Telangana