Petitioner filed an infructuous petition under S. 482 Cr.P.C. to quash criminal proceedings for sections 498A, 506 IPC, and D.P. Act as charge-sheet was already filed and investigation completed.
Criminal Petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
MONDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE SHAMEEM AKTHER
Between:
CRIMINAL P E TITION NO: 3664 0 F 2020
Ivls. Sagari, D/o Sanjay Raju Vatchavayi, Aged about 23 years, Occ. Student, presenfly Residing in USA,pei.maneht n7o ir.rrtoib, I"ff.*ifi, l,4aharanipeta, Vrsakhapatnam. ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.4
ANO
,..RESPONDENTS
Petition under section 492 of cr.p.c praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminar petition, the High court may be preased to quash the proceedings in FIR No. 89/2019 on the fire of pS lr corridor
l.A. NO: 2 oF 2020
Petition under Section 4g2 of cr.p.c praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminar petition, the High court may be preased to grant interim stay of all further proceedings pursuant to FIR No.g9/2019 on the file of PS lr corridor, including the arrest of the petitioners, pending disposal of the Crl.P.,
This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri pARSA ANANTH NAGESWAR RAo, Advocate for the petitioner and of the Assistant public Prosecutor (TG) on beharf of the Respondent No.1 and None Appeared for the Respondent No.2.
The Court made the following : ORDER
THE HON'BLE DT. JUSTICESHAMEEM AKTHER
CRIMINAL PETITION No.3664 of2O2O
9BDEB:
This Criminal Petition, under Section482 ofthe Codeof Criminal Procedure, 1973, is filed by thepetitioner/A.4seeking to quash theproceedings againsther in Crime No'89/2019 of IT Corridor Police Station, registered for the offencesunder Sections 498A, 506 IPC, Sec.3 & 4 ofD.P.Act.
Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this Criminal Petition shall stand closed.
\
Sd/.B.SATYAVATHI ASSTSTANT REG|STRAR //TRUE C}pyfi SECTION OFFICER
To SECTION OFFICER 1. The Station House Officer, pS lT Corridor, Hyderabad. 2. t The Station House officer, Women C"l, ir;i;;#i, nyderabao. to Public Prosecutor, High court ioi t," s-i"t"or telangana, Hyderabad 3,1f". 4. One CC to Sri parsa Anantha Nageswar Rao, Advocate (OPUC) 5. Two CD Copies .----"-' 6. One Spare bopy - \ Ki .#-"
HIGH COURT
)
ORDER
!.
ATE OF
o
F -SStS z
) tq
,/
'.,f'
CRLP.No.3664 ot 2020
Dismissing the Crl.p. as infructuous.
1s ))
1 issue framed by the court
Whether proceedings under Sections 498A IPC, 506 IPC and Sections 3 & 4 of D.P. Act can be quashed on a criminal petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
6 provisions across 5 enactments
Sagari
The State of Telangana
Krishnapriya
Dr. Shamim Akther
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
