Dismissed

Thirupathi Prasad v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC4 Oct 2021CRLP/3641/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court dismissed a criminal petition filed under Section 482 CrPC seeking to quash proceedings under Sections 290 and 506 IPC. The petition was rejected as infructuous since investigation was completed and the charge-sheet was already filed.

What did the court decide?

Criminal Petition dismissed as infructuous; petitioner at liberty to workout other remedies; miscellaneous petitions closed.

Thirupathi Prasad Vs The State of Telangana — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Telangana HC (2021)

¶1

IN IHE HIGH COURT FOR

¶2

Ar iiil#xBlBrE^{oF TETANGANA}

¶3

IUOI/DAY. THE FOURTH n.v ^E ornor.o"r"Jifr iflIp[r?ol?.'.

¶4

Between:

¶5

rHE HoNouRo".. o[.1i1?J.

¶6

AKTHER 'HAMEEM

¶7

CRIM INAL PE TITIO NNO : 364 10 F2020

¶8

Ill,lp+ll ?1.:gq.,^{s/o. Rajaiah,} Aged abour 28 vea rus/4, Thadikatviriase, (esauaputu", rr,r"njJr, il,.iffi:lrpfii.,IJi:r," Job, R/o. H.No.

¶9

AND ...PET|T|oNER/ACCUSED

¶10

The State of Telanoana, Rep.,by public prosecutor, High Court Buildings at Hyderabad. Througih p.S. KbrininagJ;.-^{' '-""}

¶11

......Respondent

¶12

Smt. Kemsaraou 6 Thirupathi Komala, W/o. prasad, Aged about 2g years, Occ. Rrcconducto,,pTov,.i-r,im,iTf ,h'.$JB!#l#ffS[ts1,i"#f il"^_,

¶13

Petition under Section 482 of cr.p.c praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminar petition, the High court may be pleased to quash the proceedings against the petitioner/Accused in FrR No.42 of 2020 on the file of P.S. Karimnagar-ll Town

¶14

LA. NO: 2 oF 2020

¶15

Petition under Section 482 o'f cr.p.c praying that rn the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal petition, the High court may be pleased t0 stay of all further proceedings against the^{petitioner/Accused} in FtR No.42 ot 2o2o on the file of P. S. Karimnagar-ll Town in pending disposal of the Quash Petition

¶16

This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the [,4emorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of STi.VENKATESWARLU DASARI, Advocate for the Petitioner and of the Assistant Public Prosecutor (TG) on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and None Appeared for the Respondent No.2.

¶17

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶18

L^-'z/

¶19

THE HON,BLE^{DT. ]USTICESHAMEEM AKTHER} I I P T N 1 t o

¶20

ORDER:

¶21

This Criminal^{Petition, under Section482 of the Code of} Criminal^{Procedure,1973, is filed by the} petitioner/ accused seeking to^{quash the proceedingsagainst him in Crime} No.a2l2O20^{of Karimnagar-II Town Police Station'registered for} the offences^{under Sections 290 and 506 IPC'}

¶22

Heard. Perused^{the record'}

¶23

In the^{course of submissions,it is brought to noticeof this} Court by the learned^{Assistant Public Prosecutor that} investigation in the subject^{crime was completed,charge-sheet} has been filed before the Court^{concerned and Calendar Case} number is assigned.

¶24

Under these circumstances, nothing survives^for adjudication in this Criminal Petition.

¶25

Accordingly, this Criminal Petition is dismissed as infructuous. However, the^petitioner is at liberty to workout the remedies available u nder law.

¶26

Miscellaneous Petitions, if any,^pending in this Criminal

¶27

Petition shall stand closed.

¶28

Sd/.K.AN/MAJI ASSISTANT^REGISTRAR //TRUE CoPY/t Gb SECTION^OFFICER

¶29

To 1. The Additional^{Judicial First classt\ilagistrate,Huzurabad. Karirnnaqar District'} 2. The station^{House officer'K"'fi"d"t;;;1;i;Jb'lation't<arimnasarDistrict'} H'gh C;"t^{ior the stale of relansana'}

¶30

J. rwo Hvderabad ccs^{to the (OUT) public} ".#liu;[ibl, .tu Dasari, Advocate (OpUC)

¶31

1. Ohe CC^{to Sri Venkateswar} Two CD^CoPies

¶32

1. One SPare^CoPY Kj l', ^---=.-^---=.-

¶33

l', ^---=.-^---=.r -F,/ [-.,,./'

HIGH^COURT

DATEO^OAI1ol2O21

ORDER

CRLP.No.3641 ol 2020

1 $Es
'r
co r2i offi?'1?1 2 lt
/

¶39

DISMISSING THE CRL.P. AS INFRUCTUOUS.

Thirupathi Prasad v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Thirupathi Prasad v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rathulavath Bheemla Vs The State of Telangana

Palley Santhosh Vs The State of Telangana and another

Gaddam Veeranna Vs The State of Telangana

T. S. K. Ashwin Kumar Vs Tubati Srivalli

Sayeed Ul-Akther , Hyder Vs The State of Telangana and another

Ms. Sagari Vs The State of Telangana and Another