The High Court dismissed a criminal petition under Section 482 CrPC as infructuous and of no survival for further adjudication based on the submission by the Assistant Public Prosecutor.
The criminal petition was dismissed as infructuous and miscellaneous applications pending were dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
MONDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE G. SRI DEVI
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 2862 OF 2016
Between:
S. Satyanarayana, S/o. Late. Shankaraiah, Aged about 58 Years, Occ: Retired Cameraman, R/o. H. No: 11-1-65912, New Bhoiguda Class, Near Sitaram Bagh, Aghapura, Hyderabad.
...Petitioner/Respondent
AND
... Res ponde nUPetitio ne r
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to call for records relating to tM.C. No. 341 of 2014 on the file of the Additional Metropolitan Session Judge for the Trial of Jubilee Hills Car Bomb Blast Case Cum Additional Family Court Nampally, at Hyderabad and quash the order of interim Maintaince Dated: 30.12.2015passed in Crl.P.N/.P.No.'l 15 of 2014 in M.C.No.341 ol 2O14.
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2016(CRLPMP. NO: 29I I OF 2016 )
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the l/emorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order of operatron passed in Crl.P.N/.P.No.115 of 2014 in tt/.C.No.341 ol 2014, passed by the Additional lt4etropolitan Session Judge for the Trial of Jubilee Hills Car Bomb Blast Case Cum Additional Family Court Nampally, at Hyderabad, pending disposal of the above Criminal Petition.
This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the lt4emorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Smt Annapurna Sreeram, Advocate for the Petitioner and the Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and of Sri Anantha Chary Kurella, Advocate for the Respondent No.2
The Court made the following: ORDER
CRIMINAL PETITION No.2862 of 2016
HONOURABLE JUSTICE G. SRIDEVI
ORDER:
Learned Assistant Pubtic Prosecutor for the respondent-State woutd submit that the cause in this CriminatPetitiondoes not survive for further adjudication and the CriminaIPetitionhas become infructuous.
In that view of the matter, recording the saidsubmission,
the Criminat Petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Miscettaneous apptications, if any,pending shalIstand
dismissed.
SDIM,MANJULA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To,
MMK gbr
HIGH COURT
DATED: 1210412021
:)T4T€,
1
1
r)iJ 2 B l.PH 2021
*
i)"
ORDER
CRLP.No.2862 of 2016
DISMISSING THE CRIMINAL PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS
2)
t-q 6
1 provisions across 1 enactments
S. Satyanarayana
The State of Telangana
S. Raja Rani
G. Sri Devi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
