Thatikanti Thirupathi v. The State of Telangana
Case brief
What is this about?
Petition under Section 439 CrPC seeking anticipatory bail was dismissed by the High Court of Telangana as infructuous because the petitioner had already been arrested.
Petition under Section 439 CrPC seeking anticipatory bail was dismissed by the High Court of Telangana as infructuous because the petitioner had already been arrested.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR o" oF rE LA N GA NA
"o?*tf"HE
,[U'f,'6J8i^HT[t#fi i,iK:
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE G. SRIDEVI
CRIMI NAL PETITION NO :2558 o F2021
Between:
I[]'$ij]: offi3153" Bll""lil:1il;*f;:o25 years, caste Kummari,
AND
...petitioner/Accused No.1
... Responde nUCom plainant
Petition under section 43g of cr.p.c praying that in the circumstances stated in the l'4emorandum of Grounds of crimrnar petition, the High court may be preased to direct the station House officer, r\rrandamarri, Adirabad District to rerease them in the event of his arrest in connection with cr.No.21 o,f 202i, on the fire of porice Station Mandamarri, Adilabad District on furnishing the sureties as ordered by this Court, in the lnterest of Justice.
This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of M/s Bokaro Sapna Reddy, Advocate for the Petitioner and the public prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and of the Respondent No.2 not appearing in person or by Advocate.
The Court made the following: ORDER
HONOURABLEJUSTICE G. SRI DEVI RIMINAL ON .2s58 0F 20 1
ORDER:
Ms. B. Sapna Reddy, learnedcounsel lor the petitioner/A-1, would submit that the cause in this CriminalPetitiondoes not survive for further adjudication, as the petitioner/A- t has already been arrested and the Criminal Petition has become infructuous.
In that view of the mattt:r, recording the saicl submissior-r, the Criminal Petition is dismissecl as infructLrous. Miscellaneous applications, il any, pending shall stand dismissed.
To,
SD/.B.SATYAVATHI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// l'[---' SECTION OFFICER
1 The lAdditional Judicial Mag-istrate of First Class at Mancherial. 32 Two The Station House Officer. CCs to the public prosecutor, High fif"nO"mrrri pof Court i." toi ilt.", fl.," itrt" fVrncherial of Telangana District.at Hyderabad [OUT] 4. One CC to M/s Bokaro Sanna Reddy, Advocate tOpUCl Two CD Copies MMK gbr . \ j*--
HIGH COURT
DATED: 0910412021
TAre
9,9
(
NB 2$21 0
oo 21
i:
D;:9r>a1C'
ORDER
CRLP.No.2558 of 2021
DISMISSING THE CRIMINAL PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS
'L6 <br>
Petitioner/Accused Nos. to 2A
State of Telangana/Respondent No. 1
Ashadapu Ramaswamy/Respondent No. 2
G. SRIDEVI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court