High Court dismissed petition to quash FIR. Ordered police to follow Section 41-A Cr.P.C. and Arnesh Kumar guidelines, prohibiting arrest of petitioners till investigation completion.
Directed SHO to follow Section 41-A Cr.P.C. and Arnesh Kumar guidelines; directed not to arrest petitioners till completion of investigation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
WEDNESDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF IMARCH
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 1175 OF 2021
Between:
.,.PETITIONERS
AND
Petition under Section 482 ol Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the F1R.No.18512020 on the file of the I Town Police Station, Karimnagar
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2021
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in FIR No. 185/2020 on the file of the I Town Police Station, Karimnagar.
This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri P.NAGENDRA REDDY, Advocate for the Petitioners and of the Additional Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and of Advocate for the Respondent No.2 not appeared either in person or by Advocate.
The Court made the following: ORDER
/t !//
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN
CRIMINAL PETITION No.1175 of2O21
ORDER:
This Criminal Petition, under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, is filed by the petitioners/ accused Nos. 10, 12 to 14 seeking to quash the proceedings against them in Crime No.185 of 2O2O of Karimnagar I (Town) Police Station, Karimnagar, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 419, 42O,406 and 409 read with 120-B I.P.C.
Miscellaneouspetitions, if any, pendingshall standclosed'
(2014) 8 SCC 27 3 Sd/.K.AMI\4AJI ASSISTANT REGIST R
,TRUE COPY'
SECTION OFFICER
To 1. The StationHouse officer, I Town Police Station, Karimnagar District. -Court. . 2. Two CCs topubtic pro"uiiior, ff igh for the State ofTelangana,Hyderabad (ouT) s. b; cC to SriP.NagendraReddy,Advocate (OPUC) 4. Two CD CoPies Kj \ --
HIGH COURT
DATED:0310312021
s TA
1
e
r) 1g t{AR 2021
ORDER
CRLP.No.1175 of 2021
Disposing the Crl.P.
"\49
% 6
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to quash FIR proceedings against petitioners or direct adherence to Section 41-A Cr.P.C. and Arnesh Kumar guidelines.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar and anotherApplied¶31
(2014) 8 SCC 27 · Who else cites this
4 provisions across 3 enactments
Afreen Begum
Rukshana Begum
Mohammed Zarina
Rehana Begum
State of Telangana
P. Pavan Kumar
K. LAKSHMAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
