Dismissed

Abburi Venkata Ramakrishna Prasad v. The State of Telangana and another

Telangana HC5 Feb 2021CRLP/254/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court at Hyderabad disposed of Criminal Petition No. 254 of 2021, filed by the petitioner to quash a non-bailable warrant. Relying on the submission that the matter was infructuous, the court dismissed the petition without further adjudication on substantive grounds.

What did the court decide?

The criminal petition was dismissed as infructuous.

Abburi Venkata Ramakrishna Prasad Vs… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Telangana HC (2021)

¶1

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA^{AT HYDERABAD}

¶2

FRIDAY .THE FIFTH DAY OF^FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE^{G SRI DEVI}

¶5

CRIMINAL PETITION NO:^{254 OF 2021}

¶6

Between:

¶7

Abburi Venkata Ramakrishna^{Prasad, S/o. Ramanadham,} Age.52 Years, Occ.Business, R/o. Flat. No.^{201, H.No. C-677 (6-3-2183)'} NGOs Colony, Vanasthalipuram, Hayathnagar,^{Ranga Reddy District.}

¶8

...PETITIONER/ACCUSED^NO.5

¶9

AND

¶10

The Commissionerate, Ranga State of Telangana ,^{through S.H.O., Reddy District, represented by Public Prosecutor, P.S. Vanasthalipuram,Rachakonda. High} , Court at Hyderabad.

¶11

Ch. Madhu Babu, S/o.^{Kshitesh Chandra,Age.54 Years, Occ Advocate,,Fl/o} , - i.ruJ. 1o-tl -74717,Flat.No. 13, Ir/anjuApartments, Ivloosarambagh, tr/alakpet' Hyderabad- 500036.

¶12

...RESPONDENT/DEFACTO.COMPLAINANT

¶13

Petition under section^{482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstancesstated} in the Memorandum of Grounds^{of criminalPetition, the High courtmay be pleased} to quash the NBW issued^{straight away against the petitioner/Accused No.5,} without issuing any summons^{for his appearancein c.c.No.327 of 2006, on the file} of the HonJrable XXIV^{Additional Metropolitan Ir/agistrate, Cyberabad,at} Hayathnagar, through^{orders, dated1510312012.}

¶14

t.A. NO: 1 OF 2021

¶15

Petition under Section^{482 of cr.P.c praying that in the circumstancesstated} in the Memorandum of Grounds^{of Criminal Petition,the High Court may be pleased} tostayoftheorderpassed,daledl5tO3l20l2,issuingtheNBWstraightaway ,grintt the^{petition e rlAccu sed No.5, in C.C.No.327 ol 2006} '^{on the file of the} H-onorable XXIV Additional^{Metropolitan Magistrate, cyberabad, at Hayathnagar,} and to^pass

¶16

ThisPetitioncomingonforhearing,uponperusingtheMemorandumof GroundsofCriminalPetitionanduponhearingtheargumentsofSriK vENUMADHAV ,Advocate^{for the Petitioner and the Public Prosecutor on behalf of} the Respondent^{No 1.}

¶17

The Court made the^{following:ORDER}

¶18

HONOURABLE^{JUSTICEG' SRI DEVI}

¶19

CRIMINAL^{PETITION NO.254 OF 2021}

¶20

ORDER:

¶21

¶22

SriK.Venumaclhav'learnedcounsellorthepetitroner/A-5' u,onld submit^{that the cause in this CriminalPetiliondoesnot} survive^{further adjudication and the CriminalPetition has becomc} infructuous.

¶23

Inthatviewofthemattef,recordingthesaidsubmission,the

¶24

Criminal^{Petition is dismissedas infructuous'}

¶25

To,

¶26

Miscellaneous^{applications'ifany' pending "n*} ::U ,9f"riqa--^{.-"+---a*r^-#56ryfi}

¶27

t[RuE^coPY'Il sEcTloN^oFFlcER

¶28

1^{rhe XX'V Additiona,chief} i"j:",::ffiff: xl:,:llllli,^Ill;*""0"

¶29

, l:".?1il!:i.t:ir {til::'k:'i""';'.,", the state or re,ansana'^at

¶30

t l}3"?$":"tl!+: :--r-ADHAv Advocate iopucr

4.^{OneCCtoSRtKVEIT}

5.^{Two CDCopies}

HIGH COURT

GSDJ

DATED:0510212021

ORDER

CRLP.No'254^{ot 2021}

¶39

'i4
1 t1
q
oO 12 tEB 2fi?1 Z

ot: s tr

¶40

DISMISSING^{THECRIMINALPETITION}

¶41

AS INFRUCTUOUS.

¶42

)4
fi1

Abburi Venkata Ramakrishna Prasad v. The State of Telangana and another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Abburi Venkata Ramakrishna Prasad v. The State of Telangana and another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

R. Venkata Krishnaiah Vs The State of Telangana

Gopisetti Nagendra Prasad Vs The State of Telangana

Sode Lingaiah , Tula Vs The State of Telangana

Mohammad Jahangeer Pasha Vs State of Telangana

V. Madan Mohan Reddy Vs State of Telengana

Sadhan Sarkar Vs State of Telangana