Allowed

Yedavalli Suresh v. State of Telangana

Telangana HC20 May 2021CRLP/197/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This judgment granted regular bail to the petitioner, an accused under the NDPS Act charged with transporting ganja. The court imposed conditions including the execution of a personal bond with sureties and periodic reportings.

What did the court decide?

Criminal Petition allowed; petitioner granted bail subject to a personal bond of Rs. 20,000 with two sureties of like amount and weekly reporting.

Yedavalli Suresh Vs State of Telangana — Narcotics (NDPS) | Telangana HC (2021)

¶1

[³¹⁶⁸¹

¶2

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD/

¶4

THURSDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE

¶5

:PRESENT:

¶6

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN

¶7

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 197 OF 2021

¶8

¶9

Between:

¶10

Yedavalli Suresh, Son of late Janaiah

¶11

Petitioner/Accused No.1

¶12

AND

¶13

State of Telangana, Represented by its Public Prosecutor, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad

¶14

RespondenUComplainant

¶15

Petition under Section 437 & 439 of Cr.P.C, praying that in the circumstances stated in the Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to enlarge the^petitioner/ Accused 1 on bail in FIR No.424l2020, on the file of Police Station Bhadrachalam Town daled 1411212020.

¶16

The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the grounds filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of Sri J P SRIKANTH, Advocate for the Petitioner, PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for the Respondent, the Court made the following.

ORDER:

t t

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN

¶21

CRIMINAL PETITION No.197 OF 2O2L

¶22

ORDER:

¶23

This is an application for regular bail. The petitioner herein is accused No.1 in Crime No.424 of 2O2O of Bhadrachalam Town Poiice Station, Bhadradri-Kothagudem District. The offences alleged against the petitioner are under Section 8(c) read with Section 20 (b) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act.

¶24

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the record.

¶25

According to the prosecution, the petitioner was transporting ganza weighing 105 kgs., and his vehicle i.e., Toofan bearing registration No.AP-24-TA-7869 was seized from his possession under a cover of panchanama. Learned Public Prosecutor, on instructions, would submit that the Investigating Officer has recorded the statements of eight witnesses under Section 161 of Cr.P.C., and FSL report is awaited.

¶26

A perusal of the material would reveal that the petitioner is in jail from 14.12.2O2O. As stated supra, the Inve stigating Officer has already recorded the statements of eight witnesses and FSL report is pending. The petitioner is a driver. According to the learned Public Prosecutor, there are no cases against the petitioner for the similar offences

¶27

Considering the said aspects, this Court is inclined to grant regular bail to the petitioner.

¶28

Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is allowed and the petitioner is granted bail subject to the following conditions:

¶29

i. The petitioner sha1l execute a personal bond for a sum of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees twenty thousand only) with two sureties lor the like sum each to the satisfaction of the Special Sessions Judge for Trial of Cases under NDPS Act-cum-l Additional Sessions Judge at Khammam.

¶30

ii. The petitioner sha11 appear before the Station House Officer, Bhadrachalam Tou,n Police Station, Bhadradri-Kothagudem District, on every Sunday between 10.00 AM and 5.00 PM, till completion of investigation and filing of charge sheet.

¶31

iii. The petitioner shall cooperate with the Investigating Officer.

¶32

Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, sha1l stand disposed of.

¶33

. SD/-K.VENKAIAH .ASSISTANT REGISTTiAF.

//TRUE COPY//

SE NO FFICER

To,

The Special Sessions Judge for Trial of Cases under NDPS Act-cum-l Addl. Sessions Judge, at Khammam

¶38

The Judicial Magistrate of the First Class at Bhadrachalam.

¶39

The Superintendent, Dishict Jail, Khammam.

¶40

The Station House officer, P.S. Bhadrachalam Town, Bhadradri-Kothagudem District.

¶41

One CC to SRI J P SRIKANTH Advocate [OPUC]

¶42

Two CCs to PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, High Court at Hyderabad.^(OUT)

¶43

One spare copy

HIGH COURT

KL,J

DATED:20t0512021

ORDER

CRLP.No.197 ot 2021

BAIL

I
,J
l_ l
1
1$[
\<br>('f 1. $ 4i
i) r).
i?

Yedavalli Suresh v. State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Yedavalli Suresh v. State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Junxin India Technology Private Limited Vs The State of Telangana

M/S Pioneer Infotech Pvt. Ltd. Vs The State of Telangana

M/s Pioneer Financial and Management Services Ltd. Vs The State of Telangana and 2 others

Zaheera Begum Vs The State of Telangana

Jatoth Raj Kumar Vs The State of Telangana and Another

Smt. Mudari Rajamma Vs The State of Telangana