Dismissed

Maddela Prashanth Kumar and another v. The State of Telangana and another

Telangana HC8 Dec 2021CRLP/16/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court dismissed the petition under Section 482 CrPC as infructuous because the charge sheet had already been filed. The court granted liberty to the petitioners to file a fresh petition specifically challenging the charge sheet.

What did the court decide?

Petition dismissed as infructuous; liberty granted to file a fresh petition challenging the charge sheet.

Maddela Prashanth Kumar and another Vs The State… — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Telangana HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF^TELANGANA

¶2

AT HYDERABAD

¶3

WEDNESDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN

¶6

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 16 OF 2021

¶7

Between:

¶8

Maddela Prashanth Kumar, S/o. Premanandam, aged about 45^years, Occ.Advocate, Rl/o. H. No. 1-6-22812-1 , Near Brahman Temple Ramnagar, Hyderabad.

¶9

¶10

1. Smt. Maddela Anitha"Anitha Jayalatha, Wo. Anil Prem Kumar Badhe, aged about 49 years, Occ..Housewife, Fi,/o. H.No. 7-1-51, Post Office Basthi, Bellampaill Mandal, Mancherial District.

¶11

...Petitioners/Accused Nos.l and 2

¶12

AND

¶13

The State of Telangana, through S.H.O., Peddapalli Police Station, Peddapalli District, represented by Public Prosecutor, High Court, Hyderabad.

¶14

Puli Srinivas Reddy,S/o. Govinda Reddy, Occ. Retired Singareni Employee, R/o. H.No. 1 -1 -9218 lB, Shanthinagar, Peddapalli Peddapalli District.

¶15

... Responde nts/Com plainant

¶16

Petition under Section 482 ot Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to call for the records relating to the F.l.R.No. 486 of 2020 on the file of Peddapalli Police Station, Peddapalli District, and to quash the proceedings thereon.

¶17

l.A. NO: 2 OF 2021

¶18

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings including the arrest of the petitioners in F.l,R,No. 486 of 2020 on the file of Peddapalli Police Station, Peddapalli District, pending disposal of the Criminal Petition.

¶19

l.A. NO: 3 OF 202'l

¶20

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to receive the additional material papers ie (l) Pahani Patrika (ll) Order in Wp 3095 o'( 2018 dated: 13 of 212015 (lll) Plaint in O.S. No.66 of 2019 (tV) Copy of FtR No.2 of 2014 of Peddapalli Police Station (Vl) copy of FIR 438 o,f 2O2O of peddapaili Police Station in the interest of justice.

¶21

¶22

This Petitlon coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri C. H. Jayakrishna, Advocate for the Petitioners and the Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and of the Respondent No.2 not appearing in person or by Advocate.

¶23

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶24

THE HON'BLE JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN

¶25

CRIMINAL PETITION No.16 of 2021

¶26

ORDER:

¶27

Learned Public Prosecutor placed on record the photo copy of the case details of the subject matter and the same is made as part of the record.

¶28

A perusal of the sarne, it is revealed that the investigation is completed in the subject crime, charge sheet is filed and the same is taken on file vide C.C.No.l4l of 2021.

¶29

In view of the same, this Criminal Petition is dismissed as infructuous granting iiberty to the petitioners to file a fresh petition challenging the charge sheet itself.

¶30

Miscellaneous petitions, il any, pending in this criminal

¶31

To,

¶32

pe tition, shall stand closed.

¶33

. *"-Sfl:B_.SXT?AVATHI ASSISTANT^REGISTRAR ,TRUE COPY' & SECTION OFFICER

¶34

1 The Station House^{Officer, Peddapalli Police Station' Ramagundam'}

¶35

I
I

¶36

2 TwoCCstothePublicProsecutor,HighCourtfortheStateofTelangana,at Hyderabad [OUT]

¶37

3 One CC to Sri C.^{H. Jayakrishna, Advocate} [OPUC] 4 Two CD CoPies

One Spare CoPY k"MMK

HIGH COURT

DATED:0811212021

ORDER

CRLP.No.16^{ol 2021}

Y
lq
It t<br>I
0l luN zszz
\tn \ts:l-l .^*'.

¶44

DISMIssINGTHECRIMINALPETITIoN,ASINFRUcTUoUS.

¶45

{1/ \o
Dlt '
t9

Maddela Prashanth Kumar and another v. The State of Telangana and another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Maddela Prashanth Kumar and another v. The State of Telangana and another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt.P.Maheshwari , Mahalaxmi Reddy Vs The State of Telangana

Sangani Anki Reddy Vs The State of Telangana and Another

S. Sagar Vs The State of Telangana

Manya Naveen Vs The State of Telangana and another

K.Tejaram Murthy Vs The State Of Telangana, And Another

Shaik Kareemuddin Vs The State of Telangana