Dismissed

R. Prabhakar v. Sri Rahul Bojja IAS and 2 others

Telangana HC6 Aug 2021CC/472/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court concluded a contempt case after the respondent government issued G.O.Rt.No.96, which complied with earlier court orders by regularizing the petitioner's suspension and releasing pension benefits pending a Supreme Court appeal. The court closed the file.

What did the court decide?

The contempt case is closed. Liberty is granted to the petitioner to challenge G.O.Rt.No.96 dated 01.07.2021 if aggrieved.

R. Prabhakar Vs Sri Rahul Bojja IAS and 2 others — Contempt of Court | Telangana HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶2

FRIDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI

¶5

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 472OF 2021

¶6

Contempt Case under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act to^Punish the Respondents herein for violating, disobeying the Orders of the High Court dated 25.09.2020 in W.P.no.15139 o'f 2020.

¶7

Between:

¶8

R. Prabhakar, S/o. Venkataiah, Age: 65 Years, Occu:^{Asst. Social WelfareOfficer} (Retd) Mahabubabad, Warangal District, H.No.24-7-2251412, Pragalhi Nagar Colony, Near N.l.T., Hanamkonda, Warangal Urban Dist^-506 001

¶9

...PETITIONER/in W.P.No.15139 of 2020

¶10

AND

¶11

Sri Rahul Bojja lAS, S/o. Not known to Petitioner, Principal Secretary to Govt., S.C. Development Department, Secretariat Building, Hyderabad.

¶12

Smt. Dr. Yotiga Rana, l.A.S, W/o. Not known to Petitioner,^The Commissioner/Director, S.C. Development Department, State^{of Telangan,DSS} Bhavan, Masab Tank, Hyderabad.

¶13

Sri. Anindya Das Gupta, S/o not known to^{petitioner,The Accountant General} (A and E), State of Telangana, Saifabad, Hyderabad

¶14

...RESPONDENTS in W.P.No.15139 of 2020

¶15

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI R. SUDHAKAR

¶16

Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 & 2: GP FOR SOCIAL^WELFARE

¶17

Counsel for the Respondent No.3: SRI NARASIMHA^{SHARMA, SC FORA & E} The Gourt made the following: ORDER

¶18

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SI- AVILI

¶19

CONTEMPT CASE No.472 ol2021

¶20

ORDER:

¶21

When lhe moller is token up^f or heo^-ing, leorned Government Pleoder oppeoring for the resp<>ndents hod coniended thot the order^possed by this Court hos been complied with ond the cose of the^petiiioner wos considered ond the Stote Government hod issued G.O.Rt.No.96 doted⁰¹ .07.2021, wherein the suspension period of the^petilioner wos regulo'ized ond the pension ond pensionory benefiis were releosed in fovour of the pelitioner, subject to S.L.P. pending before the Hor'ble Supreme Court.

¶22

Leorned counsel oppeoring for the^pelitic>ner hos not disputed the some.

¶23

Since the order^possed by this Court hos been <:omplied with, no further orders ore required to be^possed in ihis Contempt Cose.

¶24

Accordingly, the Contempt Cose is closed. lf the^petilioner is oggrieved by G.O.Rt.No.96 doted 01 .07.2021, he i:;^qt liberty 1o chollenge the some in occordonce with low. No order os to costs.

¶25

Pending miscelloneous petitions, if ony, sholl siord closed.

¶26

¶27

SD/.CI-I.VENKATESWARU LU DPUry REGISTRAR

//TRUE COPY//

Cit

SECTION OFFICER

To,

1 Sri Rahul Bojja lAS, S/o. Not known to petitioner, principa Secretary to GoW., S.C. Development Department, Secretariat Buildinq. Hvderabad,

¶33

2 Qmt^{D1. Yotiga_Rana, t.A.S, W/o. Not knownto peliiioner,The} Commissioner/Director, S.C. Development Department, S ate of Telangana, DSS Bhavan, Masab Tank, Hyderabad.

¶34

, SJi. Anindy? Das Gupta, S/o riot known to petitioner, The lrccountant General (A ano_E), S_tate of Telangana, Saifabad, Hyderabad

¶35

4t 9nu 99 !o !1^{R. Sudhak-ar,Advocate} top0cl One CC to Sri Narsimha Sharma. Advocate tdpuct

¶36

6 Two CCs to GP for Social Welfare, High CoLirt for itie Stat,_. of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT]

¶37

7 Two CD Copies B One Spare Co v s br

HIGH COURT

DATED: 0610812021

ORDER

{ TA 14:
a
o.J 23 AUG?021
]-
.1.1' +
,

¶44

CC.No.472 ot 2021

¶45

CLOSING THE CONTEMPT CASE

¶46

q
a

R. Prabhakar v. Sri Rahul Bojja IAS and 2 others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

R. Prabhakar v. Sri Rahul Bojja IAS and 2 others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Cherabuddi Education Society, Vs Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University, Hyderabad

Mohammed Omer and another Vs The Regional Passport Office

Ragam Upender Vs The Government of India

Dr. S. Sandya U.G.C. Research Scientist, Vs the University of Hyd. and 2 Ors.

Shakapur Y Gram Panchayat, Vs State of Telangana

G. Vinay Kanth and 3 Others Vs Sri. G. Raghuma Reddy