A contempt case filed under sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act 1971 was closed as the petitioners submitted they would not prosecute the case since the underling writ petition had been finally disposed of. Pending miscellaneous petitions were also closed.
Closed the contempt case and pending miscellaneous petitions on submission by petitioners.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE P NAVEEN RAO
CONTEMP TCA SE NO i 215 oF 2021
contempt fired under Sections 10 to 12 0f contempt of courts Act 1971 to to punish the 2nd-respondent herein tor wiilfur vilratiin ano deriberatery disobedience 20589 of of the orders 2019of rhis Honbre court, dateJ. *.il io;; in rA No.1 of 2019 in w.p. No.
Betwee n:
..,,.PETITIONERS/PETITIONERS
AND
A. Gopal Rao, S/o. Not known Aged about 70 years, Chairman and lVanaging Director,Northern oower Distri6ution---b"ipl"v-'ii;;i;;;" "rrililirirJJiL, vvi i '|Her , Hanumakonda. Wara'ngal Uroan oisirici.I
..... RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT .2
Counsel for the Petitioirer(s): SRl. PRABHAKAR CHIKKUDU
Counsel for the Respondents: ZAKTR ALI DANISH (SC FOR TSNPDCL)
The Court made the following: ORDER
-2
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICEP.NAVEEN RAO
CONTEMPT CASE No.215 of2o21
ORDER:
This contempt case is fi1ed allegingviolationof the interim order granted by this Courtin I.A'No.1 of 2Ol9 in W.P.No.2O589of 2019 dated 26.09.2019.
When the matter is taken up,learned counsel for the petitioners, fairly submit that subsequently, the writpetitionwas finally disposed of. In view thereof,petitioners do not intend to prosecute this contempt case.
Recording the said submission, the Contempt Caseis closed.
Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
SD/. M. RAMANA KRISHNA DEPUTY REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To,
\ ;- TP
HIGH COURT
DATED: 0210712021
ORDER GC.No.215 ot 2021
-t s rA r€:
o,J:l t E lutltlZl .L6
I
OE ..i FAi
CLOSING THE CONTEMPTCASE
E6P'
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the contempt case should proceed when the underlying writ petition has been finally disposed of.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Bhanoth Alrahendar
Puppala Someshwar
Panuqothu Jaqan
R.V.Bhaskar
Bhukya. Raja
A. Gopal Rao
P NAVEEN RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
