Sri B.Shyam Sunder Reddy v. Sri B.Janardhan Reddy, I.A.S
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court held that a Government memo of 09-03-2021 indicating a representation was under examination precluded a finding of deliberate or wilful violation of orders. Consequently, the contempt case was closed, leaving the petitioner free to approach the Court again if inordinate delay occurred.
What did the court decide?
The contempt case is closed; leaving it open to the petitioner to bring fresh contempt proceedings if inordinate delay occurs.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICEP. NAVEEN RAO
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 108oF 2021
(contempt case Under Section l0 to 12of contemptof courtsAct to punishthe Respondent herein flor, willfullyviolating,the Order of the High Courl dated02-09-2020in l.A. No. 1 of 2020 in W.P. No.'10330 o'f 2020)
Between:
Sri B.Shvam Sunder Reddy,S/o B.Gopal Reddy Aoe about 59 vears, Occ.Retired from Service,'R/o1-9-285/3/6,Plot No. 204' Sai Ir,4iruthi, Oppl Ram Nagar Gunda, Hyderabad.
...PETITIONER
AND
- 1 SriB.JanardhanReddy,l.A.S,secretaryAgricultureandCo-operationDept' Secretariat Building, Hyderabad,Telangana.
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the Court's previous order of 02-09-2020 was deliberately and wilfully violated by the respondents.
Whether there is evidence of inordinate delay in securing approval from the competent authority.
Whether the contempt proceedings should be closed or continued.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Sri B.Shvam Sunder Reddy
- respondent
Sri B.Janardhan Reddy
Coram
P. Naveen Rao
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Telangana HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- CC/108/2021
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court