Dismissed

Sri Vancha Veera Reddy v. Smt. Pamela Satpathy and 2 Others

Telangana HC10 Dec 2021CC/1476/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court closed a contempt case (No. 1476 of 2021) filed against district officials and a Panchayat Secretary. Counsel for the petitioner alleged compliance with the impugned order, and the court accepted this submission, dismissing the cause for adjudication without costs.

What did the court decide?

Contempt case closed; no costs awarded; miscellaneous rulings pending in the matter stand closed.

Sri Vancha Veera Reddy Vs Smt. Pamela Satpathy and 2… — Contempt of Court | Telangana HC (2021)

¶1

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA^{AT HYDERABAD}

¶2

FRIDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF DECEMBER

¶3

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR

¶6

CoNTEMPT CASE Noi 1476OF 2021

¶7

Contempt Case under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 to punish the respondent herein for willfully violating the Order of the High Court dated 0111112021 and 1111112021^passed in l.A. No.¹ ot^{2021 in W.P.No. 27317 of 2021.}

¶8

Between:

¶9

Sri Vancha Veera Reddy, S/o Buchi Reddy, Aged 61^years, Occ. Sarpanch of Challur Grama Panchayat Rl/o Challuru Vilage, Rajapet Mandal, Yadadri Bhuvanagiri District, Telangana^- 508105.

¶10

...PETITIONER

¶11

AND

¶12

'1 . Smt. Pamela Satpathy, District Collector, Yadadri Bhuvanagiri District, Collectorate Building, Hyderabad-Warangal Highway Bhuvanagiri, Telangana^- 5081 16

¶13

Smt. Sunanda, District Panchayat Officer, Yadadri Bhuvanagiri District, Collectorate Building, Hyderabad-Warangal Highway, Bhuvanagiri, Telangana^- 5081 16.

¶14

Sri G. Umesh, Panchayat Secretary, Challur Gram Panchayat, Rajapet Mandal, Yadadri Bhuvanagiri District, Telangana.

¶15

...RESPONDENTS/CONTEMNORS

¶16

lA NO: 1 OF 2021

¶17

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to^grant leave to array Sri G. Umesh, Panchayat Secretary, Challur Gram Panchayat, Rajapet Mandal, Yadadri Bhuvanagiri Distrlct, Telangana as RespondenUContemnor No. 3 herein for better adjudication of the Contempt Case.

¶18

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. N S ARJUN KUMAR

¶19

Counsel forthe Respondent Nos.1 to 3: GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ

¶20

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶21

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T. VINOD KU]VIAIT

¶22

IONTEMPT CASE No.1476 OF 2O2l

¶23

¶24

ORDER:

¶25

Learned lounsel for the petitioner submits that the respondents hr ve passed orders permitting the petitioner to function as a sa'panch and, therefore, there is a compliance of the order passed b5 this Court and thus the cause in the Contempt Case does not sr rvive for adjudication by this Court.

¶26

2 Recording the above, the Contempt Case is closed. No costs.

¶27

Miscellanr lus petitions pending, if any shall stanc clcsed.

¶28

SD/. C.V.MALLIKAR.J UNA^VARMA DEPUNT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY/' ,iu

SECTION OFFICER

To,

Smt. Pamela Satp lthy,^{District Collector, YadadriBhwanagiriDistrict,} Coitectorate Builtii^{rg,'Hyderabad-Warangal Highway Bhuvanagiri, Telangana-} 5081 16

¶33

Smt. Sunanda,^{Dir trict Panchayat Officer, Yadadri BhuvanagiriDistrict,} - CoiieCtorate euitOi rg, Hyderab;d-Warangal Highway, Bhuvanagiri, Telangana - 5081 16.

¶34

Sri G. Umesh, Par chayat^{Secretary, Challur Gram Panchayat, Rajapet Mandal,} Yadadri Bhuvanag ri District,^Telangana.

¶35

Two CCs to GP fo Panchayat^{Raj, HighCourt for the State of Telangana at} Hyderabad [OUT]

¶36

One CC to Sri N.^{I . Arjun Kumar, Advocate} [OPUC]

¶37

Two CD Copies 7 One Spare Copy

CDL

HIGH COURT

DATED:1 011212)21

ORDER

E 5T476:
.. rrr' 9!'ll7
l. J ii Liii ()

¶44

CC.No.1476 of 2021

¶45

CLOSING THE CONTEMPT CASE WITHOUT CO:iTS

¶46

Sri Vancha Veera Reddy v. Smt. Pamela Satpathy and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sri Vancha Veera Reddy v. Smt. Pamela Satpathy and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The Mahaabubnagar Grains and Seeds Merchants Association Vs The Commissioner and Director of Marketing Committee

Rice Millers Association rep by its Secretary Vs the Commissioner and Director of Marketing Committee

Rasi Seeds Ltd. Vs the Station of A.P and 51 Others

Guguloth Ramdas Vs Danasari Bayamma

Sunkara Ramakrishna Vs Sunkara Srinivasa Rao

Bakka Pullaiah Vs The State of Telangana