Dismissed

The Mahaabubnagar Grains and Seeds Merchants Association v. The Commissioner and Director of Marketing Committee

Telangana HC9 Dec 2021WP/27042/2008

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Telangana dismissed a writ petition challenging an impugned notification regarding weighment charges. The court noted that a similar writ petition filed by another association was dismissed and applied that reasoning to this case, allowing the petitioner's case to fall out of court.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition was dismissed without costs.

The Mahaabubnagar Grains and Seeds Merchants… — Consumer Protection | Telangana HC (2021)

¶1

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶2

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

THURSDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF DECEN/BER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T, VINOD KUMAR

¶6

WRIT PETITION NO: 27042 OF 2008

¶7

Between:

¶8

The IVahaabubnagar Grains & Seeds ltr]erchants Association, Mahabubnagar (Regd.No.100/69) Mahabubnagar District rep.by its General Secretary K. Suryanarayana,S/o,K.Yellaah aged 45 years Occ:Business, R/o.D.No.1-71S2lSlAl3, New Gunj,tr/ahabubnagar

¶9

...PEIIoNER

¶10

AND

¶11

1 The Commissioner & Director of Marketing Committee, Goverment of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad

¶12

2 The Agricultural market Committee,Mahabubnasar, rep.by its a"lflJE$o*o.*r,

¶13

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue writ order or direction more^particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the impugned notification No.S11(1)2/6919/2008 dated 29.9.2008 issued by the 1st respondent and consdquential letter No.AMClMl26t}g091423 daled 20.10.2008 issued by the 2nd respondent as illegal, arbitrary, u nco nstitutiona I and without authority of law and against the^provisions contained under AP (Agricultural Produce & Live Stock) markets Act,1 966

¶14

l.A. NO: 1 OF 2008(WPMP. NO: 35424 OF 2008)

¶15

Petition under Section 151 CPC^praying that in the circumstances statedⁱⁿ the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be^pleased to stay the collection of weighment charges from the members of the^petitoner association by suspending impugned notification No.Sl 1(1)21691912008 dated 29.9.2008 issued by the 1st respondent and consequential letter No.AMC/M/26/09-09i423 dated 20.10.2008 issued by the 2nd respondent^pending disposal of the writ^petition Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI K. VENKATESH GUPTA

¶16

Counsel for Respondents: GP FOR AGRICULTURE

¶17

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶18

¶19

¶20

THE^HCN'BLES RI JUSTICET.^VINODK R

¶21

w lIT^{PETITIONNO .2704aOF2OOcq}

¶22

ORDER:

¶23

is fiied^{todeclare the imPugned} This Writ^Petition notification^{No'S1 1(1)2/6glg I 2OO8' dated 29'O9'2008issued by} the^{1st respond:nt and consequentialletterNo'AMClMl26lo9-} Ogl423^{dated 2l'10'2008 issued by the 2nd respondenl as illegal'} arbitrary,^{unco lstitutional and without authority of larw and} against^the Pro^{isionscontainedunder A'P' (AgriculturalProduce} & Live^{Stock) M rrket Act' 1966'}

¶24

He ard^{l' arned Counsel for the petitioner etnd learned} Government^{Pl :ader for Agriculturefor respondentNos"1 ztnd 2'}

¶25

The enti^{'e case of the petitioneris basedon the Wnt Petrtton} filed by^{the R 'ce Miller'sAssociation represented by its Secretary} Shri^{GouruS linivas, Miryalagudain W.P.No.7948r>f 2008. The} said Writ^{Pe'ition is dismissedby this Court today' Since'the} petitioner's^{< ase is basedon the aboveWrit Petition'the order} passed^{ther' in wili also apply in all force to the case of the} petitioner^{all o'}

¶26