Contempt appeal dismissed as infructuous because the appellant, Ch. Vijaya, had expired a year prior to the hearing, making adjudication impossible.
Contempt appeal C.A.No.36 of 2015 disposed of as infructuous along with pending applications.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
TUESDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF IMARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI AND THE HON'BLE SRIJUSTICE B.VIJAYSEN REDDY
CONTEMPT APPEAL NO: 36 OF 2015
Contempt Appeal Under Section.l 9 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1g71 aggrieved by the order dated 0g-12-2015 in c.c.No.1B57 of 2015 on the fite of the High court.
Between:
Ch.Vijaya, Tahsildar -cum- Enquiry Officer, Dharur Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.
...Appellant / Respondent
AND
l. P.Raghuveera Reddy, S/o P.Narsi Reddy, Antharam Village, Ranga Reddy Dist.
.. Respondent / Petitioner
.. RespondenURespondent
(Respondent No.2 is not necessary in this petition)
APPLICATIO N NO: 1512 OF 201s
Petition under section'1 51 cPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to suspend the order rssued by this Hon'ble court in c.c.No.1g57 0,f 2015, dated 09.12.2015 during the pendency of the instant appeal .
PPLICATI N NO: 1513 OF 2015
Petition under section 15i cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to set aside order issued by this Hon'ble court in c.c.No.1B57 of 2015, dated:0g.i2.20.1 5 during the pendency of the instant appeal.
Counsel for the Appellant: SRI A. SANJEEV KUMAR,
SPECIAL GOVT. PLEADER
Counsel for the Respondent NO.1: SRt. V. RAMAKRISHNA REDDy
The Court delivered the following: JUDGMENT
Itenr No.54
THE HON'BLIi THE CHI[,F JUSI'ICE I{IMA KOHLI ANI) TIIE tlO:,i'BLIi SRI ,,US-tlCU B. 'l .IAYST]N II.EDDY
C.A.\o.36 ol'2015
.ITJDGMEN't: (l'cr tht' Hon'blc the Chiel .lusticc I Iirna Kohli)
L Mr. A. Sanjeev Kuutar, Iearned Spccial(lovernurent Pleader.iilr the appellant states that the appellant had expired a year ago and
therelore nothing survives lbr adjudication in the present appeal.
along with the pending applicatior.rs, ilany,
//TRUE COPY//
SD/.K.SRINIVASARAO JOINT REGISTRAR 6i'
SECTION OFFICER
To
HIGH COURT
DATED:0210312021
HE 5 TA r4r
1 6 t'/lAB 2021
o
*
lr
JUDGMENT
GA.No.36 ot 2015
DISPOSING OF THE APPEAL
AS INFRUCTUOUS
@ L\ 3
Ch.Vijaya
I. P.Raghuveera Reddy
Sri Raghunandan Rao
Hima Kohli
B.Vijaysen Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
