The petitioner applied for writ relief regarding her non-reinstatement and service termination by the outsourcing agency. The petitioner's counsel sought leave to withdraw the petition while reserving rights to approach the Labour Court, which was granted, and the petition was disposed of as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE S'I t'0";,", 6"IE,3i l:l$:,fliAr HYDERABAD
o * oiI6 ' I g i,iJi,l",fll, p,[ffi.J
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF ,, =ro*, r.., ;;; #SJ :'rr^*f#l
WRIT PE TITION NO. 4050 0F 2021
Between:
Smt. K. Satyavani. D/o. IVlallaiah Age 38 years, Occ.FutTime l,4asalchi (FTIV), Ill Addl. Judiciat l,4agistrate of First crass c"ourt, k;c;'g;J,;;. RJo. H. No. to-o_rertblr, ruear cayatri Bhavan, [Mamillagudem. Xt r,"iur]'xh;;;;, District _ 507001.
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue writ or direction preferably writ of [r,4andamus, declaring the action of the Respondents No. 3 and 4 in not allowing the petitioner to continue in service as Full Time lVasalchi (FTIV) in the Respondent No. 3 without there being any order of termination or suspension and without issuing any notice, as illegal, arbitrary and violative of principles of nalural justice and consequently direct the Respondents to reinstate the Petitioner into the service and grant all consequential benefits with a rrea rs.
lA NO: 1 OF 2021
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances statedin the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may bepleased to direct the Respondent No. 2 to 4 to consider and dispose of the representation dated 1310912020 of the Petitioner, pending disposal of the main Writ Petitionin the interest ofjustice.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI K. PAWAN KUMAR FOR SRI SURYA BALU MAHENDRA
Counsel for the Respondent No.1: SRI MALUGARISUDERSHAN, S.C. FOR T.H.C
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2 to 4: -
The Court made the following: ORDER
Itern No.i HON' BLE'IHE CIl IEF .ltrSTIC I! tll IIA KOHLI TI{E ANI) THE HON,BLEST{IJ L S'TIC t- B. ',t,I AYSE\l{EDDY
\'.P.No.'1050 of 2021
ORDER:(Per the Hon'blethe Chief JusticeHima Kohli)
1 . After addressingarguments for some time, Mr' K' Pawan Kumat, leamedproxy counsel appearing for the petitionerseeksleave to withdraw thepresent petition,while reserving the right of his client to approach the Labour Courtseeking relief againstthe respondent No.4 alone, on the ground that herservices have been illegally terminated by the said respondent(Outsourcing Agency).
disposed ol as not pressed along r,i,'ith thc pe nding applications, if any.
SD/-I.NAGALAKSHMI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ,TRUE COPY' ca) SECTION OFFICER
To, 1 9n" 99 Io 9r!Surya BatutVlahendra,Advocate IOpUCI 2. One CC to Sri l\rlalugari Sudershan. S.C. for T H:C tOpUCl 3. Two CD Copies.
JVP
HIGHCOURT
DATED:0110312021
ORDER
WP.No.4050 of 2021
I
<br>'{ $E Srrq 14.
Jo-
Q t6l,lAfl 2021 c
fi. e i C,\1, i,
DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION AS NOT PRESSED WITHOUT COSTS
Zff4
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Smt. K. Satyavani
The High court for the state of Telangana, Rep. by its Registrar (Administration)
The Principal District Judge, Kothagudem
The Additional Judicial Magistrate, Kothagudem
Sri Sairam Outsourcing Agencies
Hima Kohli
B. K. Rayse Meddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
