Writ petition filed declaring non-registration of an FIR illegal under Article 226 was permitted to be withdrawn by the petitioner.
Permission granted to withdraw the writ petition; same dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA (S pecia I Original J u risdiction)
TUESDAY ,THE EIGHTH DAY OF SEPTEIVBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P. NAVEEN RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 9409 OF 2020
Between:
Anugu Bhagya Lakshmi, W/o Late Ravindar Reddy, aged about 42 years, Occ, Agriculture, R/o D.No.6-34, Green Hills Colony, Saroornagar, Ranga Reddy District.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may bepleased to issue a Writ, Order or Directron more particularly one in the nature of Writ of It4andamus declaring the action of the 5lh respondent in non-registration the FIR against the respondent No.6 and 7 basing on lhe complaint on 08/06/2020 made by the petitioner highly is illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional, and violation of Articles14, 15 and 21 of the Constitution of lndia and also in violation of Principles of Natural Justice and consequently direct the respondent No.5 to register the FIR against the respondent No.6 and 7 basing on the complaint on 0810612020 made by the petitioner,
lA NO: 1 OF 2020
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the High Court may bepleased to directthe respondent No.5 to register the FIR against the respondent No.6 and 7 basing on the complaint on 0810612020 made by the petitionerpending disposal of the writpetition.
Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI RAPOLU BHASKAR
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 5: GP FOR HOME
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.6 & 7:-------
'l'hc Cr.rurt nlil(lc thc lirllorr ing: OIll)l:R
l
TIIE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P. NAVEEN RAO
WRIT PETITION No. 9409 0F 2020
ORDER:
Sri Rapolu Bhaskar, Iearned counsel for the petitioner,
seeks permission ol the Court Lo r,r'ithdrau the u'rit, petition.
Permission is accorded and the u,rit petition is dismissed as
rvithdrawn. Pending miscellaneous petitions shall stand closed.
SD/-C H.VENKATESWARULU ASSISTANT REG R
,TRUE COPY//
SECTI OFFICER
To,
tT/
c,-
HIGH COURT
DATED:08/09/2020
1 t\ e STAr€
(
('l
q
o
t5 StP ?-08
(.) )
/
t .., -l
ti'
ORDER
WP.No.9409 ot 2020
DISMISSING THE WP
AS WITHDRAWN,
WITHOUT COSTS
1
Anugu Bhagya Lakshmi
The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary
The Superintendent of Police, Nalgonda
A. Butchi Reddy
Kara Sudhakar
P. Naveen Rao
C. Venkateswarulu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
