Petitioner approached High Court under Article 226 seeking mandamus for registration of FIR by SHO due to alleged inaction. Court was informed that FIR was registered viaurahKr. Petition dismissed as cause ceased to exist since grievance was redressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA (Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY ,THE EIGHTH DAY OF SEPTEIVBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P. NAVEEN RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 15003 OF 2020
Betwee n:
A.Rldhakrishna, S/o.Late. Satyanarayana, Aged 58 years, Occ.Govt. Employee, R/o.FIat No.219, Landmark Apartments, Behind Saket Towers, Raja Rajeswa ri Nagar, Kapra, ECIL, Hyderabad.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue any Writ, order or direction more especially one in the nature of Writ of lvlandamus declaring the action of the sth Respondent in failing to Register the Complaint of the Petitioner, D|.2310712020 under Acknowledgem ent, D1.2810712020 inspite of compliance of provisions of Cr.P.C till date against the 6th Respondent herein as illegal, arbitrary, un Constitutional and contrary to the provisions of Cr.P.C and consequently direct the Respondents 2 to 5 herein to forthwith Register and lnvestigate the Complaint of the Petitioner, D1.2310712020 under Acknowledgement, D1.2810712020 for taking necessary action against the 6th Respondent.
lA NO: 1 OF 2020
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances statedin the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may bepleased to direct the 5th Respondent to forthwith Register and take up the lnvestigation on the Complaint of the Petitionet, Dt.2310712020 under Acknowledgem ent, Dt.2810712020 pending disposal of the above writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner:M/S. C HARI PREETH
Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 5: GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent No. 6: _
The Court made the following:
l
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P. NAVEEN RAO
WRIT PETITION No.15OO3 OF 2O2O
ORDER:
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondents 1to5.
SD/.N.CHANDRA SEKHAR RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ,TRUE COPY//
To,
J SECTION OFFICER
B. Two CD Copies.
PI\4
HIGH COURT
DATED:0810912020
ORDER
WP.No.15003 of 2020
1 H e s r.4l It:
t
oo rl g stp z0z0 z
* cF P.AT c *{'
Disposing of the WP
<br>$
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition survives probe knowing that the crime was registered on 04.09.2020 under Sections 504 and 506 IPC addressing the petitioner's grievance regarding non-registration.
3 provisions across 3 enactments
A.Rldhakrishna
The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department
The Commissioner of Police, Rachakonda Commissionerate
The Deputy Commissioner of Police, Malkajgiri Zone
The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Kushaiguda Division
The Station House Officer, Kushaiguda Police Station
P. Naveen Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
