Disposed

Sattaru Venkata Reddy v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC10 Jan 2020WP/518/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This common order disposed of five writ petitions challenging the registering authority's refusal to register documents. Relying on a prior common order, the court directed the authority to receive documents and reject them only if justified under Section 76 of the Act of 1908, with reasoned orders.

What did the court decide?

Directing the registering authority to receive documents and reject them only under Section 76 of the Act of 1908 with reasoned orders within one month.

Sattaru Venkata Reddy Vs The State of Telangana — Property and Title | Telangana HC (2020)

¶1

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY

¶2

W.P.NOs.518, 577, 610, 752 AND 877 OF 2020

¶3

COMMON O R D E R

¶4

The issue involved in all in these writ petitions is one and the same, and hence they are being disposed of by this common order.

¶5

Aggrieved by the action of the registering authority in refusing to register the documents presented by the petitioners in respect of their subject lands, the present writ petitions have been filed.

¶6

Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the issue involved in the present writ petitions is squarely covered by the common order dated 09.07.2019 passed by this court in W.P.Nos.13016 and 13045 of 2019 and, therefore, similar order may be passed in the present writ petitions.

¶7

Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, appearing for the respondents, has not disputed the above submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners.

¶8

In view of the same and for the reasons alike as recorded in W.P.Nos.13016 and 13045 of 2019 dated 09.07.2019, the present writ petitions are disposed of directing the registering authority, to receive the documents as and when they are presented and process the same without reference to the notification dated 25.09.2013 issued by the Collector, Malkajgiri Division, Quthubullapur Mandal, Rangareddy District. In the event the said documents are found to be fit for registration, the register authority shall complete the due formalities in accordance with law and release the documents. However, if he still finds any ground to exercise power under Section 76 of the Act of 1908 and refuse registration, he shall pass reasoned orders and communicate

¶9

the same to the petitioners. This exercise shall be completed expeditiously and in any event, not later than one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, be it from whatever source.

¶10

It is also made clear that mere registration of these documents would not confer title upon the properties covered thereby, if it is otherwise wanting, and would not preclude the Government from taking appropriate steps as warranted by law, if it seeks to assert any right or title over the said properties.

¶11

Interlocutory applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. No

¶12

order as to costs.

¶13

-----------------------------------------
A.RAJASHEKER REDDY,J
DATE:10—01—2020
avs

Sattaru Venkata Reddy v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sattaru Venkata Reddy v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/s.Sri Talasila Estates Pvt. Ltd, Vs M/s. Pudami Builders Pvt. Ltd. Company.

N.Krishna Rao and 3 others Vs The State of Telangana and 3 others

Banoth Shankar Vs The State of Telangana

Golla Hanumanthu Vs The State of Telangana

Ryali Nagamalleswari Vs The State of Telangana

Challa Janga Reddy Vs The State of Telangana and 4 others