Dismissed

P. Jai Kishan, v. The District Collector (P.W)

Telangana HC4 Mar 2020WP/4868/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner, a Panchayat Secretary Grade-III, filed this writ petition seeking exemption from departmental tests for promotion to Grade-II due to age. The court directed the respondent authority to consider the petitioner's representation and communicate a decision within four weeks.

What did the court decide?

Directing the 2nd respondent to consider the petitioner's representation regarding promotion entitlement and communicate the decision within four weeks.

P. Jai Kishan, Vs The District Collector… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Telangana HC (2020)

¶1

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO

¶2

WRIT PETITION No.4868 OF 2020

¶3

DATED :04.03.2020

¶4

Between :

¶5

P. Jai Kishan S/o.P. Ramulu, Aged about 49 yrs Occu : Panchayat Secretary, Gr.III, Bompally Gram Panchayat, Doma Mandal, Vikarabad District.

¶6

..... Petitioner

¶7

And

¶8

The District Collector (P.W), Ranga Reddy District at Hyderabad & others.

¶9

The Court made the following:

¶10

¶11

HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO

¶12

WRIT PETITION No.4868 OF 2020

¶13

ORDER :

¶14

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader for Services-I for learned Government Pleader for Panchayat Raj appearing for the respondents.

¶15

Petitioner is working as Panchayat Secretary, Grade-III of Bompally Gram Panchayat and aspiring for promotion as Panchayat Secretary, Grade-II. According to petitioner, he crossed 45 years. For promotion to the post of Panchayat Secretary, Grade-II, an employee must pass departmental tests and on the ground that petitioner has not passed departmental tests, he is not considered for promotion. According to petitioner, since he has already crossed 45 years, he is entitled to seek exemption from passing departmental tests, for granting promotion, in accordance with G.O.Ms.No.165, dated 22.04.1997, but the same is not extended to him. Aggrieved by non-consideration of entitlement for promotion, petitioner made a representation on 19.08.2019 to the District Panchayat Officer-2^nd respondent. Alleging inaction on the said representation, this writ petition is filed.

¶16

Since a representation is already made ventilating the service grievance of petitioner and the same is yet to be acted upon, without expressing any opinion on merits, the Writ Petition is disposed of, directing the 2^nd respondent to consider the representation submitted by the petitioner and to take appropriate decision as warranted by law, and communicate the same to the

¶17

¶18

petitioner, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.

¶19

__________________ P.NAVEEN RAO,J

¶20

4^th March, 2020 Rds

P. Jai Kishan, v. The District Collector (P.W)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

P. Jai Kishan, v. The District Collector (P.W)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

B.Satyam, R.R Dist, Vs the Managing Director, Hyd and 2 Others

Md. Waheed Vs The Telangana State Public Service Commission

Bhukya Rajesh Vs The Telangana State Power Generation of Company Limited (Tsgenco) and 2 Others

Sri Guvva Anjaneyulu, Ex- Estates Officer Vs The Chairman and Managing Director

S. Vamshi Krishna, Vs The State of Telangana

Gownicadi Venkateswar Vs Tsrtc and 5 others