In a writ petition challenging dispossession of farm servant hut, the Court, noting the petitioner's absence, directed respondents not to dispossess without due process and disposed of the petition.
Petitioner not to be dispossessed without following due process of law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI WRIT PETITION No.35264 of 2014
ORDER:
When the matter is taken up for hearing, none appeared on behalf of the petitioner, in spite of the fact that the writ petition is listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’.
Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
______________________________ ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI, J
11th February 2020 mar
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the writ petition can be disposed of by directing respondents not to dispossess petitioner without following due process of law in absence of petitioner.
Whether to pass any order on costs.
Petitioner
Respondents
ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
