The court dismissed a writ petition as infructuous based on counsel's submission that the cause no longer survives for adjudication. No substantive legal proposition is formed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI
WRIT PETITION No.2039 of 2018
ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the cause involved in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication and, therefore, the matter may be dismissed as infructuous.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed.
_________________________________ ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI, J Date: 10th February, 2020 KL
Petitioner
Abhinand Kumar Shavili
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
