This order directs the 1st respondent to dispose of the pending revision or stay application filed in 8 weeks, while preventing disposal of litigation land pending its hearing.
Directed disposal of revision/stay application in 8 weeks; interim stay on dispossession of land.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE T.VI NOD KUMAR
WRI T PETI TI ON No.2498 of 2020
O R D E R :
The present writ petition is filed questioning the action of the 1st respondent in not considering and disposing of, either the revision, or the interlocutory application filed along with the revision, by the petitioners, on 14.03.2019, against the order, dated 29.01.2019, passed by the 2nd respondent in C.M.A.No.66 of 2013.
2
Date:06.02.2020
_____________________ JUSTI CE T.VI NOD KUMAR
GJ
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court should direct the writ jurisdiction to disposal of the pending revision/stay application filed in the underlying tenant matter.
Whether the High Court can grant interim relief preventing dispossession pending disposal of the revision application.
Petitioners
State (represented by Government Pleader)
1st Respondent
2nd Respondent
3rd Respondent
T.V.I.Nod Kum
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
