Mohammed Mushtaq Malik v. The State of Telangana And 4 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
SRI JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR WRIT PETITION…
SRI JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR WRIT PETITION…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WRI T PETI TI ON No.2236 of 2020
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE T.VI NOD KUMAR
ORDER :
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Special Government Pleader for Home for respondents.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that subsequent to filing of the writ petition, the respondent authorities have issued proceedings rejecting the application of the petitioner dated 31.01.2020 seeking permission for “24x7 sit in peaceful protest” on 05.02.2020. The learned counsel for the petitioner also submits that, while the writ petition was pending, the petitioner has decided to change the location and has approached the respondent authorities seeking permission at the changed venue and has submitted an application to that effect to the Commissioner of Police, Hyderabad City, on 06.02.2020 i.e., today.
Since, the petitioner has approached the authorities seeking permission at the new location, the authorities shall consider the same in accordance with law and also taking into consideration the law and order situation.
The Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed in the light of this final order. No order as to costs.
____________________ JUSTI CE T.VI NOD KUMAR
Date: 06.02.2020 Grk
Note: Issue CC by today. (B/o.) Isn
Petitioner
Commissioner of Police, Hyderabad City
T. Vinod Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court