Petitioner sought withdrawal of Writ Petition under Article 226 and separate petition for injunction under section 151 CPC. Court granted liberty to withdraw and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Liberty to withdraw the writ petition was granted; the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATEOF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY ,THE SECOND DAY OFDECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE M,S,RAMACHANDRARAO AND THE HONOURABLE SRt JUSTICE T.AMARNATHGOUD
WRIT PETITI ON NO: 21112OF2020
Between:
Mis lVluralidhara Agencies, Groundfloor. 3/43, main Road, Enkoor Villageand l,4andal, Khammam District, state of Telangana-S07168Rep. by its sole proprietor sri Pinni Venkata Narayana S/o. Veeraiah, agedabout66 years,Occ BusinessR/o,Enkoor Village and lt4andal, Khammam District. Stateof Telangana-So7168
...PETTTTONER(S)
ANO
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of theconstitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavitfiled therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue writ, order or direction moreparticutarlyonein the nature of writ of certiorari to call for the records andquash the orderdated19-09-2020 in form vAT 3054,against the petitioner herein, assessingwith referenceto the returns and non-existent books of accounts of thepetitioner withoutissuing prior notice under rule 25 (5) of the Vat Rules 2005, without territorial .jurisdiction,inherentjurisdictionand barredby the limitation under section 20(4),21 (3 to 6) and rule 59 (4) clause (ii), subclauses (iii and iv) of the Vat rules 2005 asillegal,arbitrary, null and voidand rulestherein lA NO: 1 OF 2020
Petition under section 151 CPCprayingthat in the circumstancesstated in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition,the High court may be pleasedto suspend the operation of the order. dated19-09-2020 in form: vAT 305A, issued by the assistant commissioner- l. State Tax.Khammam i.e., 3rd respondentto the petitioner pending disposal of the writpetition
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. S.MADAN MOHAN RAO
Counsel for the Respondents:GP FORCOMMERCIAL TAX(TG)
The Court made the following: ORDER
V
THE HON'BLESRI JUSTICE M.S'RAMACHANDRARAO
AND
THE HON'BLESRI JUSTICET.AMARNATHGOUD
WP.NO,2LLL2of 2020
ORDER:
Counsel forpetitioner(s) seeks to withdraw this Writ Petition withliberty to file additional objections to the show cause noticedt.lg.Og.2020issued by the 3'd respondent'
shal1 standclosed.
SD/. SAILESHI ASSISTANTREGISTRAR
,TRUECOPY//
,(L
SECTIONOFFICER
To,
Avs
\
HIGH COURT
DATEDi02l12l2020
ORDER
W.P.No.211 12 of2020
( s I,q h g
Jo
o 15 FEB 2O 21
o
-t
*
DS.Sptit C rtrC
DISMISSING THEW.P. WITHOUT COSTS
..)<br>ty
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Misl Vuralidhara Agencies
State of Telangana
M.S. Ramachandra Rao
T. Amarnath Goud
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
