Writ petition raising a promotion dispute was dismissed as withdrawn upon the petitioner's request, subject to a liberty to file a fresh petition if promotion was not considered thereafter.
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to approach court if promotion not considered.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STA-I:,9T TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Speciat orisinat ..lrri"iiJtiori ^,
THURSDAY,THE THIRD DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND rWil.r-r:"'"
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTIC..E M,S.RAMACHANDRA RAO
THE HoNoURABLE sRI.I",T?,". T.AMARNATH GoUD
WRIT P ETITIO NNO: 2043 0F 2020
Between:
Malkani YlrOgl Bhojraj. D/o. Bhojraj Matkani, aqed a Director, olo oire.rol Ji lniurance. Tetangana. u;oerafjolt 41 vears. occ- Deputy
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of writ of L4andamus, declaring the action of the respondents in not considering the case of the petitioner for promotion to the post of Joint Director for the panel year 2017-1g though the 2nd respondent has issued Memo No. 10271168lA2tAdmn.l/2016, dt. 14.08.2019 and Memo No.'1027i168lA2lAdmn.ll2016, dt. 28.10.2019 requesting the 1st respondent to submit lhe proposals for effecting promotion to the post of Joint Director is as illegal, arbitrary, unjust and contrary to the orders issued in G.O.l,4s.No. 1 87, dt. 25.04.1 985 and consequently hold that the petitioner is entitled to be promoted to the post of Joint Director for the panel year 2017-2018 with all consequential benefits in terms of the orders of this Hon'ble Court in W.P.No. 36768/201 8, dt. 1 2.10.201 B.
lA NO: 1 OF 2020
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to forthwith consider the case of thepetitioner forpromotion to thepost of Joint Director in the existing available vacancy by duly implementing the Memo No. 1 027 I 1 681 A2l Admn. l/201 6, dt. 1 4.08.201 I and l\ilemo No. 1 02711 68/A2l Admn.llZj1 6, dt. 28.10.2019, issued by the 2nd respondent, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition, and pass
lA NO: 2 OF 2020
Between:
P. Sunitha Bai, W/o. R. Ravinder, aged about 45 years, working as Assistant Driector of lnsurance District lnsurance Office, Karimnagar.
...PETITIONER/PROPOSED RESPONDENT NO. 3
AND
I/alkani NitubenBhoiraj, D/o Bhojraj tvlalkani'aged about 4'1 years' Occ-Deputy i]i?J.il; cj);.Dii"Ctoi oi'r ns Jrance; relansa na' Hvd erabad'
...RESPONDENTS/PETITIONERS
...RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS
Petition under Section'1 51 CPC prayingthat in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the High court may be pleased to permit the petitioner/pro posed 3rd Respondent to comeon recordby impleadingher as party respondent No. 3 in W.P. No. 2043ol 2020.
lA NO: 3 OF 2020
Petition under Section'1 51 CPCpraying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the High Court may bepleased to direct the respondents to forthwith consider the case of the petitioner for promotion to the post of Joint Director in the existing available vacancy without reference to the pendency of the main W.P.No. 204312020 before considering the case of the juniors to the petitioner.
Counsel for the Petitioner:SRl. CHANDRASEN LAW OFFICES
Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SERVICES I
The Court made the following:
IIONO URABLB SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACIIANDRA RA O
AND
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.A]{ARNATH GOUD
WRIT PETITION No 2043 ot 2 20
ORDER: (Pcr Hctn'ble Sri Justi.e .l[.5. Rant.tch.tndra Rao)
Learned counsel Ibr petitioner seeks to withdraw this Writ
Petition with libefty approach this Court in tlie event petitioner,s
request lor promotion is not considered by responclents.
Granting liberty as sought, this Writ Petition is dismissed as
withdrawn. No costs.
Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, shall
stand closed.
SD/.K.VENKAIAH ASSISTANTREGIST
//TRUE COPY//
\
SECTIONOFFICER
To,
1 . One CC tolr//S.CHANDRASENLAWOFFICES tOo',3lort",ungana. 2 . il; dCti"GiiorServices l,High Courtforthesta J Two CD CoPies
[OUT]
Pt\4
HIGHCOURT
DATED:03/1212020
1t{
oo r0 3 DEC ?il20
*
ORDER
WP.No.2043 ot 2020
Dismissing the WP As withdrawn Without costs.
Malkani Yaro Bhojraj
The Director of Insurance, State of Telangana
State of Telangana
M.S. Ramachandra Rao
T. Amarnath Goud
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
